Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
So, Rezko is a convicted felon and Ayers is an unindicted mad bomber. All these Democrats have friends like that ~ else there'd be no Democrat party. It's never bothered the electorate before and there's no reason why it will bother them now.

On the other hand, most Democrat politicians had parents who were firm believers in abortion for other people's kids. Obama's momma appears to have not had firm beliefs in that regard. I'd kind of like to keep his own situation with regard to his mother's lifestyle choices out there front and center since it's such an afront to core Democrat beliefs (or "hates").

Think about it, Obama's momma didn't abort him so why does he want to abort other women's babies? Certainly a campaign quickie can be worked up around that concept.

2,415 posted on 07/08/2008 1:50:55 PM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2411 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Back in 1960, abortions were illegal. No reputable doctor performed them.


2,428 posted on 07/08/2008 2:43:33 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2415 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
On the other hand, most Democrat politicians had parents who were firm believers in abortion for other people's kids. Obama's momma appears to have not had firm beliefs in that regard.

Not necessarily. She at least wasn't willing to violate the law of the land at the time, especially not in some back alley abortion operation. Can't say as I blame her. Besides, crazy as she was, she probably thought it was "noble" to have the baby of an older man (about 7 years older) from a third world country. She may or may not have known about the other wife. I'd say if there exists a marriage certificate and license from a US state, probably Hawaii, then she likely did not know, but if there isn't then she's much more likely to have known. Funny that no one can up with that document either. But the completely private wedding ceremony is highly suspicious, most states *require* at least two witnesses in addition to the person officiating at the ceremony (Minister, Priest (Catholic, Orthodox, or Busddist) Rabbi, Justice of the peace or Imam) on the cerfiicate. The current license application also requires that the person who will be performing the ceremony be named, (and they must be licensed by the State)

2,490 posted on 07/08/2008 5:33:21 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson