Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Have you noticed that many here can’t agree on what natural-born means? Is it born here? Is it born here to American parents? Is it born anywhere to American parents? In any case, we know what they meant because of their first immigration law passed in 1790.

Because there isn't any conclusive authority on the question. And it is a reasonable view as demonstrated by the attacks on Goldwater and Romney Sr. and the current press and McCain's concern in the Senate that it was intended to mean in the territory of the 50 states.

But it is an arguable question. I don't view the 1790 statute as having much bearing because it was passed long before we had possessions and territories outside the US and when we got them, we then significantly modified the statute to revise the rules.

2,199 posted on 07/07/2008 4:34:02 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2191 | View Replies ]


To: David
But it is an arguable question. I don't view the 1790 statute as having much bearing because it was passed long before we had possessions and territories outside the US

Everything here is definitely arguable, but the 1790 law was absolute -- if you have two American parents then you are a natural-born American citizen, no matter where you were born.

2,334 posted on 07/08/2008 6:42:34 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson