Along this thread, there are several cases where somebody new registers and then comes up with a post that says something along the lines of "the world is flat, therefore Obama is a citizen and eligible to serve as President" and you suspect that the new poster might be a troll setting up a post that can be referenced as legitimate dissent.
I didn't have any trouble comprehending your post. You are simply dead wrong. And there is an exhaustive legal opinion set out here (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2040753/posts) that covers the waterfront on all of the possible legal issues other than Sec. 1409 which as set out in the thread has an effective date for persons born after November 1986.
So you come up with something to the contrary--well which word of #2040753 or which statute or what do you not agree with? Here's the law; there isn't any room for argument on the narrow point--Ms. Dunham's citizenship makes a difference but only in a very narrowly defined statutory area which Obama does not fit.
If it proves out that Obama was born in Kenya, he is not even a citizen much less eligible to serve as President.
David, they are really behind you, watch out, they are ready to get you. But seriously, with all due respect, you have lost all your arguments with me from get go. I was clear enough before your first reply to me and after and, as I mentioned before, I desire no further interaction with you due to complete and utter lack of interest. I have no need of posses to make my point nor am I in need of personal attacks to do the same.
Have fun and a great weekend (whatever’s left of it)!
Cheers!
The NewOne
I haven’t read every post in the thread, but I’ve enjoyed your analysis. You seem to know whereof you speak.