[M203M4]

If forced between choosing Obama or Hillary for president, I'd take Obama. Not because of ideology, but because of effectiveness. Obama is frankly an AA-grade idiot. His strength is in using a teleprompter to adeptly regurgitate lukewarm speeches, written by other people, in front of friendly audiences and an adoring media.

Hillary is extremely intelligent, and would be effective in destroying America (while Obama will have grander plans of destruction, but fail miserably in their execution). Hell, the Clinton machine already infects much of the government, especially the state department. While Obama would spend 2 years with training wheels, Hillary would hit the ground at maximum speed. And let's be honest about Iraq and the WOT - none of the candidates are going to change policy in any significant way when they hold the reigns of power.

The only two reasons I would briefly hesitate in making the above choice are
(1) Obama's wife. She is a deranged, vindictive, cold psycho b****. There is much more to her than meets the eye.
(2) The fallout of the neo-Messiah being dethroned would cause a MASSIVE democrat rift felt for decades. Possible popcorn overdose.

[Mr. Silverback]

The problem with your theory (which I came close to embracing myself, mind you) is this:

Commander-in-Chief-in-Training.

Nope, not acceptable.

[karnage]

For a topline idiot, Obama has managed to make himself the Dim nominee and the favorite to win the election.

[El Gato]

Hillary is extremely intelligent, and would be effective in destroying America (while Obama will have grander plans of destruction, but fail miserably in their execution). Hell, the Clinton machine already infects much of the government, especially the state department. While Obama would spend 2 years with training wheels, Hillary would hit the ground at maximum speed. And let's be honest about Iraq and the WOT - none of the candidates are going to change policy in any significant way when they hold the reigns of power.

I wouldn't be so terribly sure about that. Might not make big changes quickly, but overall policy likely will change, no matter which major party candidate is elected.

The only two reasons I would briefly hesitate in making the above choice are (1) Obama's wife. She is a deranged, vindictive, cold psycho b****. There is much more to her than meets the eye. (2) The fallout of the neo-Messiah being dethroned would cause a MASSIVE democrat rift felt for decades. Possible popcorn overdose.

It's not B. Hussein himself, or not just him anyway, that we need to worry about. A nobody first term Senator doesn't get to be a major party's nominee for President without some POWERFUL, and competent, backers. Just exactly who they are is not entirely clear, but of course Soros is likely one of them. They will see to it that competent leftists/Marxists, even though that is something of an oxymoron, are put in positions of power in an Obama administration.