Replies

Try browsing his posts for the past few weeks and see the history of his legal arguments, on both Obama and McCain. Then come back and tell us if he "lacks arguments."

Boy, where do I start? First obvious error in your posting and a basic one is that we were addressing this current post and not David's history. I was not aware of his... legal notoriety but just because he posted (as a lawyer) does not make him correct. Besides, his first point made was my date of joining FR and if that's how he starts all his legal arguments I'd be weary to have him as part of my legal counsel.

He was incorrect in his statement and he should have addressed my comment only. Amendment 14 is where any lawyer should start his/her argument and also the knowledge that to the day the Supreme Court has yet to address this issue (and neither has the Congress).

Have I been impressed on his posts and legal rendered opinions? I have not bothered to read any of his posts due to his personal attack on me followed by comments lacking the proper information, contents and knowledge and chose instead, to make my FR birthdate an issue. Weak, quite weak and I am no longer interested in what "David" has to say. He is just proof that seniority means squat when it comes to informed arguments. But it's good to know he has posses :)

...chose instead, to make my FR birthdate an issue...

Let me tell you, get over it. It's a Rite of Passage here at Free Republic. They did that to me too, on my first post, and that was back in 2000.

-PJ