Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DrC
That report is based on sampling, not a full count. Secondly, it's ABOUT 1961, which means it was necessarily prepared later, e.g. 1962!. Obama was born before the report was prepared.

Still, the only recommended categories for reporting race in 1961 that had any standing were "white" and "non white".

As far as "African" being a suitible answer for "race" it most certainly was suitible. The term was used for a couple of hundred years in legal documents called covenants on property deeds and titles. Usually there was a prohibition on selling your property to a "member of the African race".

It's dollars to doughnuts someone can come up with an Hawaiian territorian birthcertificate or two that has racial nomenclature that defies interpretation.

1,278 posted on 07/05/2008 8:47:37 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1264 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
It's dollars to doughnuts someone can come up with an Hawaiian territorian birthcertificate or two that has racial nomenclature that defies interpretation.

Haole, hapa haole, hapa hapa haole, hapa hapa hapa...

1,294 posted on 07/05/2008 9:02:11 AM PDT by null and void (every Muslim, the minute he can differentiate, carries hate of Americans, Jews & Christians - OBL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson