Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Daniel T. Zanoza
The author is so clueless about the distinction between "Doing X would be nice" and "The government should make people to X and/or extract tax money to pay for X" that it doesn't even occur to him to acknowledge the existence of the issue.

That makes the essay pretty much worthless.

2 posted on 07/03/2008 4:00:52 PM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
The more I thought about this issue, the more I understood my Constitutional rights are indeed being violated by the U.S. Government.

Yeah, the idea is that he has a Constitutional right to anything which will level the playing field. Braille bills is certainly permissible, and arguably a good idea, but to demand it as a "Constitutional right" is bullshit. I don't know this guy but he is no conservative. He is exactly the kind of phoney-baloney "victim" he feared he would hear about. ptui.

4 posted on 07/03/2008 4:27:47 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson