Posted on 06/25/2008 11:56:11 AM PDT by pissant
The following shows that the Delaware matter is nothing more than a vindictive attack by the Obama Camp those in powerful places who support Barack Obama’s dirty Chicago Style Politics.
On June 16 and 17, 2008 two letters from the Social Security Administration were mailed to my Duluth home stating that my disability and medical benefits had been terminated for the following reasons:
“Our records show that the following warrant for your arrest was issued for a parole or probation violation:”
Issued by:
New Castle County Superior Court
N King Street, Ste 500
Wilmington, DE 19801
Date of Warrant: February 5, 2008
Type of crime: probation or parole violation
Warrant Number: U708000607
Originating case number: U708000607
NCIC Number: W283822252
What is so telling about this is the following:
1. I am not now nor have I ever been on probation or parole from the State of Delaware.
2. I have not ever been charged with, tried nor convicted of any crime in the state of Delaware
3. The information contained in this letter does not match the case number indicated on the court documents dated June 23, 2008 from the “alleged” warrant used to arrest me by DC Metro Police on June 18, 2008.
I am not on any probation or any parole from any State or Jurisdiction of any kind nor have I been since my Colorado Parole was discharged on May 5, 2000.
It is just amazing how I am being targeted with non-stop manufactured warrants and charges which only surfaced after I began making public my claims against Barack Obama.
Even more interesting is Social Securities letter being dated the exact same dates that the DC Metro Police and the National Press Club security director begin organizing their plan to take me into custody on a non-existant “Fugitive from Justice” warrant.
THIS ACTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE COLORADO MATTER AS PER SSA OWN PROCEDURES. SO ANY CLAIMS BY OTHER BLOGGERS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ACTION ARE NOTHING MORE THAN THEIR TRYING TO APPEAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEY ARE. THIS ACTION WAS DONE BY OFFICIALS CONNECTED TO THE OBAMA CAMP AND THE DATE OF THE SSA LETTER SUPPORTS THIS.
Nice use of the language! Perhaps Larry should invest in a grammar checker.
Perhaps the coverup will end up being worse than the crime?
Huh?
No...the SSA cut off his disability benefits because someone reported he had a warrant in Delaware for violation of probation/parole, which was false as he has never been on probation/parole in that state. If true, this is just wrong and heads need to roll.
“So the Social Security Administration got Sinclair charged with a crime in Delaware in order to help the Obama campaign? Huh?”
No...it sounds like folks in administrative positions in many different state and federal agencies have been given the word contemporaneously that Mr. Sinclair’s life should be made difficult. The dates that he points out would seem to indicate that the social security letter was using the Delaware information as cause for it’s action. Yet, the letter was dated on the same date the Delaware action became known to anyone beyond the U. S. Marshalls. This would lead you to believe that Social Security heard about the arrest and the same day sent out a letter. When was the last time you saw that happen? Further, I may be going out on a limb here but I have been down to the Social Security office with my brother and one look around led me to believe the place was run by Obama supporters...just my opinion.
We should all be very concerned about this. Whether Larry Sinclair is telling the truth or not becomes secondary to setting the precedent for using government agencies in an organized harrassment to squelch free speech.
Aren’t we seeing a pattern here? Isn’t anyone who comes up against Obama with an opinion that is different from his, in the line of fire? Either they are racist, law breakers, making it up, using the same old politics or filled with antipathy toward people who are not like them. Obama and his campaign seem to be marginalizing even as they profess to represent the marginalized.
Larry is persistent, but rather incoherent.
How did I miss the fact that he was on disability before? What is his disability?
Maybe he has trouble typing with his mouth full...
That precedent has been established long ago - for ex: ask Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly = etc., = how often they are summoned for an audit...(audits are supposed to be random - but folks they want to intimidate seem to get 'randomly' selected year after year)
This Gestapo use of the IRS has been used extensively ever since, back in prohibition days, when they couldn't get anything to stick to Al Capone - they finally put him away on tax evasion.
We all remember the infamous "File-Gate" with the FBI files being sent over to Hitlery - but who remembers that they fired the head of the IRS and installed a friend of the hilderbeasts?
Control through intimidation through the IRS is the modus operandi of the powers that be in DC
looks like this is his second time that his disability benefits have been denied. Also, he is terminally Ill!
“1. Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve damage in upper and lower extremities
2. Defendant is terminally ill.
3. Defendant’s sole support and means of support has been Social Security Supplemental Income disability payments until receiving notice that July 30, 2004, that said payments were being halted due to the belief the defendant is fleeing to avoid prosecution.”
I guess it’s time to change his name again and apply for benefits somewhere else.
True, but does he deserve the benefit of doubt if he is on pain medication due to a disability, perhaps?
He is either a compulsive liar, or a man who has made a terrble mess of his life and is now attempting to rectify his conscious by confessing a terrible wrong.
Consider connections through the DC law firm of Williams & Connolly.
“1. I am not now nor have I ever been on probation or parole from the State of Delaware.
2. I have not ever been charged with, tried nor convicted of any crime in the state of Delaware”
This is getting pretty deep - I’m wondering how long he can keep this up.
From Larrys website (a few inches down from where he posted 1 and 2, above)
“Upon my return to Delaware, I appeared before a Superior Court Judge at 2:30 pm at which time I was released on PR bond and released. I will say that the charge is questionable at best and after speaking with my Attorney I will allow him/her decide what can and cannot be posted here.”
So he was released on “Personal Reconnaissance” which means he was most definitely charged with something, presumably the insurance fraud charge from last year. It also means that DC was justified when they arrested him and shipped him to delaware, since it’s unlikely that the charge he was bonded for was from something that happened after he they dropped him off.
I suppose that he can claim to have never been charged because he skipped town before they had a chance to actually arrest him and nobody actually served a summons to his new residence. It’s also true that a bench warrant is not a parole violation, but he’s shaving the truth awfully close at that point.
This guy is the opposite of everything that conservatives are supposed to believe it. He’s a professional victim and parasite and he still gets a heros welcome at FR. Not to mention the people who are flying him around the country and paying all his bills.
With a poster child like Larry, who needs McCain?
PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE - Sometimes called own recognizance. A person who promises to appear in court to answer criminal charges can sometimes be released from jail without having to pay bail. This person is said to be released on his or her personal recognizance.
In other words, he left the state without permission while under PR and, just like the last time I posted above, his SSA has been pulled for fleeing prosecution.
Cavorting with trolls, I see. ROFL
Hey troll, I don’t care if satan himself pancakes Obama’s political career. The question is not Larry’s squeaky clean life - as if someone who snorts coke and gives BJs to stangers is ever a good witness - the question is did Obama do this. And on the reliability scale, I’ll say Obama is about 10 rungs lower than a druggie criminal like Sinclair.
Why don’t you open your eyes?
He says he hasn’t been charged with a crime in Delaware and that he isn’t on probation. True enough.
He doesn’t mention that he is accused of a crime in Delaware and that he was released on his own recognizance because he was too poor to pay bail.
Had he not skipped town, he would be charged. He lost his SSA because he is apparently fleeing from prosecution.
When did he skip town?
Heis still in Delaware? He was in Minnesota last I heard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.