Uh, this guy is way wrong. He posted pornographic pictures of a girl he knew was underaged on-line. Doesn’t matter that she sent them, he distributed them, he is going to hang.
I agree that the boy should be punished, but I disagree with you on how harsh the punishment should be. Hanging a child would be an extreme reaction. I agree with the author that laws designed to protect children from adults should not be applied wholesale to teenage boys and the fact that the crime was committed by a teenage boy should be taken into consideration when weighing the extenuating circumstance of the crime.
A few years of being gang sodomized in prison ought to teach him, eh?
This was in the news last week and the article said that he had been asked to take the photos off the website and refused. The only way they could get him to take them down was to charge him with a crime. He asked for it and he got it. I have no sympathy for the little creep.
Since when is nudity equivalent to pornography? THINK: It is neither necessary, nor sufficient.
Fine, she took the pictures, i.e. manufactured the child pornography, and she emailed them to him, i.e. distributed child pornography, she should share a cell with him since you’re being all high and mighty about it eh???? Or are our laws only meant to be applied arbitrarily and capriciously????