I think our response should be to have them point to any legitimate recount that shows Gore won. I have spend years explaining the 2000 Bush win but nothing gets through. Asking for them to provide which recount declared gore the winner seems to stop them in their tracks because at that point there is only data and not emotion to deal with.
If I remember correctly, of all the recounting done by various members of the press after this whole mess came to an end...the only method by which Gore would have received the nomination was the the method suggested by George Bush. And then it was by only 1 vote.
Ironic to be sure, but did the media give it any significant play? Nope.