Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2008 12:48:34 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithL
Sen. Chris Dodd, for example, an early contender

That's using the word "contender" rather loosely.

2 posted on 05/22/2008 12:50:41 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

They jumped off the Clinton bandwagon because her election fraud trial is just around the corner.


3 posted on 05/22/2008 12:51:26 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

They’re Just Not Into Her


5 posted on 05/22/2008 12:53:45 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

They were just llstening to their internal polling and leftie callers.


6 posted on 05/22/2008 12:53:51 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

She’s got something up her sleeve. That’s why she’s going to run in all of the primaries.

Obama will be Giloolied between the last primary and the convention.

I’m willing to bet $10 on it.

She’s going to send me to a gulag in Alaska for posting this.


7 posted on 05/22/2008 12:58:45 PM PDT by SeanOGuano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Easy. Liberals have the scruples of wounded jackels. Once they smell blood on one of their own, they eat it alive. Ever see hens peck to death another hen that has a spot of blood on its feathers?


8 posted on 05/22/2008 12:59:35 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"Nor why, in some quarters, both conservative and liberal, she seems to inspire such mean-spiritedness."

See ex-wife, mother-in-law.


9 posted on 05/22/2008 1:01:50 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
They went against her because they were finally given a WAY to go against her. At first Obama was not so strong, then, of course, they saw him as a very good alternative.
10 posted on 05/22/2008 1:01:59 PM PDT by SMARTY ('At some point you get tired of swatting flies, and you have to go for the manure heap' Gen. LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Why, in some quarters, both conservative and liberal, she seems to inspire such mean-spiritedness?

Why so many of her congressional colleagues went against her, and in many cases so quickly?


These are same questions asked by nine of ten voters who lived in a cave during the Clinton years.

.

11 posted on 05/22/2008 1:02:32 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
It's the stunts she pulls against her fellow democrats when she doesn't get her way.

After the Indiana and North Carolina primaries, movie mogul Harvey Weinstein called up Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office, and issued all sorts of threats if they "abandoned" Hillary and declare Obama the presumptive nominee. I can just imagine how Pelosi felt.

On a personal level, I think most of them simply can't stand her.

13 posted on 05/22/2008 1:14:12 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"...whose two-term president husband brought the Democrats back from permanent opposition... Unless I'm misinterpreting the meaning of this drivel, this person is clueless.

BJ was elected in '92 while the dims were in "permanent majority" status and promptly lost both the House and the Senate to Newt.

17 posted on 05/22/2008 1:32:46 PM PDT by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I don't know, there just seems something a little dense about the thesis "apparently to know Hillary is to despise her. I wonder why?" especially if the author's next step is to restrict comment only to those who don't. One senses the author would prefer an answer indicating that it's what she is rather than what she does, notably "oh, it's because she's a Strong Woman" and hence the object of misogynistic cowardice.

But it is what she does, not what she is, and she is the one responsible for it. Rose Law Firm records and cattle futures, Billy Dale, Craig Livingstone, Vince Foster, Marines cursed at and used as personal servants; there's a pattern here that it takes someone color-blind and tone-deaf not to discern. If the author truly is in doubt perhaps that tells us more about him than it does about us...or about her.

19 posted on 05/22/2008 1:55:16 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Even though this lot supported Bill Clinton during his scandals and bashed Republicans and went along with Hitlery, they are the anything rather than Republican crowd

Now that this lot has a choice Hitlery or Boma they have chosen their poison


20 posted on 05/22/2008 2:11:50 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Don't Blame Me - I Supported Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson