Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

So, in effect, you would prefer a system where there are no candidates on the ballot. Only uncommitted delegates who would make the selection at the convention? How does a ‘return to smokey rooms’ improve this situation? That type of system seems very prone to the kind of manipulation you suspect happened this cycle.


85 posted on 06/07/2008 5:01:29 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (A true patriot will do anything to keep a Democrat out of the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

First, I don’t mind a primary with candidates. I simply don’t award delegates to those who cannot go above 50% threshold.

Second, the delegate from your level is someone you know and help select. So, yes, I’d prefer a nation of locally elected delegates vote for candidates at a convention over the system in which someone getting 37% of a vote in New Hampshire gets vaulted by the media into the lead in a few more 37% and less wins in a few early states, and thus to the


87 posted on 06/07/2008 5:12:27 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson