If by “follows the law” you mean “reinterprets ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ to mean ‘no expectation of privacy under your own clothes,’” then yes, he “followed the law.” In reality, he’s just another idiot judge who creatively interprets the law in whatever way is necessary to let the maximum number of perverts off the hook. No reasonable person would say that you have no reasonable expectation of privacy under your own clothes. If that’s true then it shouldn’t be illegal to go around lifting up skirts intentionally, as long as the person’s body is not touched. The problem is most judges don’t seem to be reasonable people.