Wolf,
1) I appreciate you throwing McCain’s quotes at Kerry in an effort to be fair and balanced but if all the hubbub is about the questions posed in Bush’s speech, how about at least asking the indignant Dems to answer the actual questions that spurred them to launch their coordinated attack in defense of appeasement?
2) Is it foolish delusion to claim that talking with terrorists will result in peace?
3) Should we negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along?
4) Aren‘t you saying like that Senator back in 1939 that ‘Lord, if only I could talk to Ahmadinejad, all of this might be avoided’?
5) Isn’t this really the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history?
6) Aren’t you defending the failed strategy of appeasement and thinking that if you go and talk with Ahmadinejad that they’ll forget their evil ways and learn to love us?
7) What makes you think they would treat a future president any better than they did Jimmy Carter?
8) When one looks at how they use the spectacle of a U.N. address to excoriate us, wouldn’t they similarly use the spectacle of ‘talks’ as a sign of legitimacy and an opportunity to offer no peaceful conciliation but rather a tool to justify the path they‘ve chosen?
9) If you speak with Iran, what demands would you make of them and what are you willing to compromise to get a deal?
10) To which kinds of terrorists would you talk and to which would you not?
Doesn’t matter. These SOB’s will get us hurt very badly and then turn it all around and blame Bush. Praying people had better pray hard.
11. Have you noticed Israel really frowns on US appeasers and lately bad things happen to terrorists when US Rat Appeasers visit them?