I won’t be deny that I could be wrong about the referenced article being pro-Obama even if it doesn’t mention Obama. But given that the article is essentially pro-Democrat, Obama, not Clinton, stands to benefit most from the news, in my opinion.
BTW, what’s your opinion about Obama’s contempt for the Constitution concerning constitutionally unauthorized federal spending?
Given Richard Viguerie's immense and inarguable contributions to the cause of principled conservatism, over the past thirty years (give or take): "I could be wrong" is the absolute least one might reasonably expect in the way of concession, really. The man's track record is, quite simply, unassailable.
given that the article is essentially pro-Democrat
Absurd. Re-read, please.