Whether I agree or not, does not really matter, neither does what I want. Again, I don’t understand your emphasis on any one society being better than another.
If you base your view upon relativism, you would say no.
The United States, then, relativistically speaking, becomes no better than Iran.
It would all be relative to POV.
See why you must embrace objectivism?
BTW, it is the moral, cultural and Post modernists who believe that they are attempting to build a better society in America than the one that now is.
I show that since Post modernists embrace relativism, that a society that they may want to create - one says that certain acts are homophobic, etc, isn't any better - relativistically speaking - than a society that says that those same acts aren't homophobic, etc.
I use relativism to refute relativism. I use relativism to refute and counter the world-view of Post modernists and cultural and moral relativists.
Relativists/Postmodern relativists say that no society is better than any other.
Since you said in post #24 that “it is all relative,” do you believe that no society is better than any other?