Now I see where you are coming from.
If there are no absolutes or no moral absolutes, who then - relativistically speaking - decides what is morally right or wrong?
Society?
If there are no absolutes, and no absolutes can be proven, then a society that says that certain acts are homophobic, racist, sexist, bigotted, greedy, etc, would be superior to a society that says that those same certain acts aren’t.
It would all be relative.
Some might say that this is an extreme view.
But the word ‘extreme’ would - based upon relativism - be a societal construct, produced by a society that was a social construct.
Again, all relative.
In the fourth line down, after etc, it should say wouldn’t, not would.
Yes, I believe society decides what is morally right or wrong.
I don’t understand the superior aspect you mention.
Yes, it is all relative.