Replies

It’s a continuing saga. Here’s a quick recap.

1. Man (Larry Sinclair (LS))says he had sex and drugs with Barack Hussein Obama (BHO)in 1999 in the back of a limo.

2. This past September, LS contacts Obama camp and tells them to correct record and admit drug use (does not mention sex) up to 1999. (FWIW, BHO admits he did drugs in college, but he was a state Senator in 1999)

2. LS is contacted by phone not by BHO, but by his church’s choir master, a gay man named Donald Young. Several times.

3. LS alleges Donald Young tries to find out who all LS told about the sex with Obama, though LS says he never mentioned sex before to anyone.

4. After multiple calls from Donald Young, it is obvious to LS that Mr. Young had sex with BHO as well.

5. Dec 2007, Donald Young is murdered execution style in his home, the third homo from Baracks church to be killed. Crime unresolved.

6. LS tries to get the press interested in his story. They listen, but send him packing.

7. LS makes Youtube video stating his allegations of sex and coke with BHO.

8. A pro BHO website, Whitehouse.com pays LS to take a lie detector test. LS ‘fails’, but was sandbagged. They used a fraud for the tester, and they refused to post the test video on their website as they had agreed.

9. In the meantime, Obama operatives are rifling through LS’s past, family, and putting out falsehoods (such as he was in a mental institution at the time of the alleged BHO affair, etc). David Axelrod - BHO’s campaign manager- acknowledged to a reporter that they were invesitgating LS.

10. LS files suit in MN District Court against Axelrod, Obama, & the DNC for harrassment and illegal investigation.

11. LS files suit in DC District Court against a series of bloggers (suspected DNC/Obama hacks) who are purposely spreading known falsehoods about LS.

12. Judge in DC grants discovery to the DC lawsuit.

13. Defendants in DC suit get Public Citizen to represent them.

14. In the meantime, LS contacts Chicago PD and tells them about his contact with Donald Young and the allegations aginst Obama in a signed affadavit.

15. Chicago PD detective is supposedly arranging an interview with LS very soon

None of this means anything if none of it can be proven. LS’s “story” is, at best, nothing more than a weak allegation. If FOX broadcasts this, they are cooked and whatever influence they might have as a network during this election will be down the tubes.

Now, I’m only saying that LS’s mere allegations are, by themselves, not newsworthy and considerably less worthy than the BS hit-piece the NYT did on McCain’s alleged frolic and detour with a real estate agent or whatever it is she was.

If there were legitimate evidence—a photo, corroborating testimony, a bounced check from Obama ala Jerry Springer (feel free to ask what I’m referring to), or anything of substance—then you have a very different outcome to the story. Right now the networks are right to stay away from this.