Posted on 05/05/2008 6:48:55 PM PDT by pissant
Welcome Larry Sinclair readers!!!!
First, what the hell is George Soros-funded, Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen Litigation Group doing supporting Larry Sinclair’s detractors? The court filings representing mzmolly, TubeSockTedD, OWNINGLIARS and the Democratic Underground were put together by Public Citizen Litigation Group. I find this incredibly interesting. Public Citizen’s involvement shows that it is going to bat for the Obama campaign…and it’s not surprising, considering that Ted Kennedy and a bunch of democrats endorse it. To my knowledge, however, its purpose was not to defend citizens from litigation - it was to go after corporations. The last I knew, Larry Sinclair isn’t a corporation.
[Public Citizen] claims to represent the interests of American consumers by fighting “for openness and democratic accountability in government; for the right of consumers to seek redress in the courts; for clean, safe and sustainable energy sources; for social and economic justice in trade policies; for strong health, safety and environmental protections; and for safe, effective and affordable prescription drugs and health care.” The means by which PC generally believes these goals can be achieved is increased government intervention and litigation against corporations — a practice founded on the premise that American corporations, like the capitalist system of which they are a part, are inherently inclined toward corruption.
They don’t, of course, take any responsibility for their being corrupt themselves.
Litigation Group: Litigating at all levels of the federal and state judiciaries, this division of Public Citizen “specializes in cases involving health and safety regulation, consumer rights, access to the courts, open government, and the First Amendment, including Internet free speech.”
Well, we can strike out health and safety regulation (because they’re the ones making death threats against Larry Sinclair; if anyone has a fear about his health and safety it’s Sinclair), consumer rights, access to the courts and open government. I guess it falls under the heading of First Amendment, including internet free speech. I guess they consider “internet free speech” such that you can tell lies and defame people under stupid pseudonyms.
It’s a “consumer rights” organization. It’s interesting to me that the Democratic Underground is consider a “consumer” here. Not that that particular side of the aisle is interesting in abiding by its own rules or that of the court, anyway…they make them up as they go along!
These people have terrorized Sinclair, called him a mental patient, and a bunch of other lies - I think they should be held responsible for it.
They object to having their star, the shifty messiah, to be forced to show up in court to answer the allegations; but seeing how artful the campaign has been to skirt the issue, I don’t see that there’s any other way to even get through to Obama or his campaign -or Axelrod, since they don’t return phone calls, and they don’t behave like human beings, or act like they need to answer to anyone. That leads me to believe it will be much the same if Obama becomes president…he thinks he knows what’s best for the rest of us, just like the moonbats at the DU, and the marxists blogging for Obama who try to generate the most flattering propaganda for the knuckledragging masses who are treating him more like a rock star than a candidate for president.
If the fact that I’m not a “marxist” makes me “right wing”, then so be it, I’ll gladly take the hit for that distinction.
The expensive lawyers who’ve magically appeared in the court proceedings in the Larry Sinclair saga have featured this blog and the comments that Larry has made here, taking his comments out of context in order to prolong this thing. Also, my blog talk radio show has become somewhat of a hit in those filings, too.
What is concerning me is their tactic of trumping up hundreds of pages of lies that have to be answered by Larry’s attorney. Larry’s attorney is only one guy - and what he’s up against is legions of the National Lawyers Guild (commie) genre. They are betting that Larry’s limited resources will help them win in the end, rather than the truth.
The ‘other side’ has revealed Larry’s social security number and other information that was not required by the court, in order to purposely put his safety even further at risk.
They continue to break the law!!!
They complain that Larry is using the courts in order for the truth to come out, and use that as the reasoning for the truth not to come out.
Larry and his lawyer need all the support we can lend them. To me this is a classic modern day David and Goliath story!!
Kudos to Larry for hanging in there!
Though Public Citizen claims to be officially “nonpartisan,” its political criticisms are aimed disproportionately at Republicans. In 2003, for instance, PC launched the website Whitehouseforsale.org, which accuses President Bush of accomplishing “his mission of destroying the presidential public financing system.” Public Citizen has also initiated BushSecrecy.org, which blames the Bush administration for post-9/11 civil liberties violations, lax regulation of allegedly carcinogenic products, cover-ups of auto-safety violations, and inadequate food-inspection standards.
So I think it’s interesting that they’re using my blog as a weapon against Sinclair…I guess anyone who identifies themselves as ‘not a marxist’ is fair game to these moonbats.
Ping
The Hitlary! bots must really be getting desperate. You do know that Sinclair failed the polygraph, right?
yeah, uh sure, that’s the story.
Might be an interesting story if I had any idea what its about. Background?
I think you will need to put up links to the ‘polygraph’ story every time you post something...hahah!
Shorthand version:
1. Man (Larry Sinclair (LS))hears Obama syas he had sex and drugs with Barack Hussein Obama (BHO)in 1999 in the back of a limo.
2. This past September, LS contacts Obama camp and tells them to correct record and admit drug use (does not mention sex) up to 1999. (FWIW, BHO admits he did drugs in college, but he was a state Senator in 1999)
2. LS is contacted by phone not by BHO, but by his church’s choir master, a gay man named Donald Young. Several times.
3. LS alleges Donald Young tries to find out who all LS told about the sex with Obama, though LS says he never mentioned sex before to anyone.
4. After multiple calls from Donald Young, it is obvious to LS that Mr. Young had sex with BHO as well.
5. Dec 2007, Donald Young is murdered execution style in his home, the third homo from Baracks church to be killed. Crime unresolved.
6. LS tries to get the press interested in his story. They listen, but send him packing.
7. LS makes Youtube video stating his allegations of sex and coke with BHO.
8. A pro BHO website, Whitehouse.com pays LS to take a lie detector test. LS ‘fails’, but was sandbagged. They used a fraud for the tester, and they refused to post the test video on their website as they had agreed.
9. In the meantime, Obama operatives are rifling through LS’s past, family, and putting out falsehoods (such as he was in a mental institution at the time of the alleged BHO affair, etc). David Axelrod - BHO’s campaign manager- acknowledged to a reporter that they were invesitgating LS.
10. LS files suit in MN District Court against Axelrod, Obama, & the DNC for harrassment and illegal investigation.
11. LS files suit in DC District Court against a series of bloggers (suspected DNC/Obama hacks) who are purposely spreading known falsehoods about LS.
12. Judge in DC grants discovery to the DC lawsuit.
13. Defendants in DC suit get Public Citizen to represent them.
14. In the meantime, LS contacts Chicago PD and tells them about his contact with Donald Young and the allegations aginst Obama in a signed affadavit.
15. Chicago PD detective is supposedly arranging an interview with LS very soon
Yes, I probably should. And a repost of post 8 here as well.
Crap, #1 should read:
1. Man (Larry Sinclair (LS))says he had sex and drugs with Barack Hussein Obama (BHO)in 1999 in the back of a limo.
wow, thanks.
Sooner or later, this scumbag Obama is going to have to answer questions about his gay lover/cocaine buddy, Larry Sinclair. Go, Larry, GO!
The best place to start is with this YouTube video posted by Larry Sinclair a few months ago. Note the number of views - - nearly 850,000:
http://www.youtube.com/user/larrysinclair0926
Why are they fighting this guy? Don’t liberals love and admire homosexuality? Ought to be a plus.
must be the allegations of crack use as a sitting state senator, I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.