New Study Prompts Scientists To Declare Global Warming Movement 'Unraveling'

Inhofe EPW Press Blog ^ | May 5, 2008 | Marc Morano

[ricks_place]

The United Nations administers the International Panel on Climate Change not the International Panel on Global Warming. The bureaucracy will continue to feed as long as the climate changes.

[353FMG]

“Can Al help us there, too?”

Screw Algore. The problem is that the world pays attention to charlatans like him. They should not be given the time of day. Where are their scientific credentials for us to accept their BS?

What are we going to do now with the rest of the environmental wackos? Allow them to deny us the use of our God-given natural resources?

[theBuckwheat]

The “consensus” of “settled science” for this week.

[Chode]

listen... warming, cooling, it was 50/50. so i took a shot!!!

Ohh WOE is me... whys everybody pickin on me???

[theBuckwheat]

>>
Now, one team has amended their model so it shows the cessation of global warming in 1998. Their amended model predicts that global warming will re-start in 2015...
<<

The Wicked Stepsister Syndrome: this shoe will fit!

[Mr_Moonlight]

There are two kinds of people in the world:

1) Those who divide people into two kinds

2) Those who don't

/chuckle

[Doomonyou]

Later

[Caramelgal]

Good news. This is what happens when the real scientist get involved.

And I’ve noticed a change lately in that many (mostly scientists) are now referring to “climate change” rather than “global warming”.

“Climate Change” is real and very well documented. The climate has been changing, sometimes quite drastically and even rather suddenly, ever since the Earth first had a climate and long before man came on the scene and the climate will continue to change with or without us. There are much more powerful forces at work that affect global climate including plate tectonics, volcanism, ocean currents, sun spot cycles and slight wobbles in the Earth’s tilt and orbits around the sun and there is nothing we can do to change or influence these forces.

But the question is, or should have been all along; is the Earth really warming for a long enough period of time to declare it more than just an anomaly over much longer trends and more reliable models and even “if” the climate is warming, is it really due to man made activity?

Of course the answer is that the activities of man have little or no effect on large scale global climate and only a very nominal effect on local climates – think of the “heat islands” in large cities during the hot summer months where the temperature in the heavily paved over downtown areas vs. the temperature in greener areas like the ‘burbs and rural areas that can vary by a few degrees. That’s truly man made “warming” but only on a small local scale and it has no real impact on the overall environment. Same with massive deforestation in localized areas – it can have a very real affect on local climates and conditions but not necessarily globally and long term as some would have us believe.

Global warming theories and dire predictions and calls for “action” is what happens when small scale statistics and scientific theories absent true rigorous scientific peer review and challenges are high-jacked by people with purely social, moral and political agendas.

[vpintheak]

Thank the Lord that some sanity is still left in the world.

[workerbee]

Then there’s these folks.

[driftless2]

These scientists have the weight of logic and reason behind their arguments, but I guarantee you none of these arguments will be printed or aired in any major (or minor) rags and media outlets. The objections of the skeptics to the man-made global warming nonsense have been virtually silenced. None but the official sputterings by the Gores and other eco-nuts are allowed to be shown to the public. Once again Big Media betrays its role as gatekeeper of the major news. Their only rule is that if the facts contrast with leftist bilge, it must be suppressed.

[xcamel]

FReepmail me to get on or off

Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)

Ping me if you find one I've missed.

---

[Beloved Levinite]

Yeah, this news is wonderful. But the paradigm shift towards “man-made” GW has no chance of changing anytime soon, unless & until someone like the former CEO of The Weather Channel sues Gore’s azz & wins - & exposes him for the total fraud he really is. It’s the only way The “opposition GW party” will get mcuh needed worldwide attention. I do hope the “weather guy” (name escapes) follows through with his “threat.”

[Admin Moderator]

The title you created " New Study Prompts Scientists To Declare Global Warming Movement 'Unraveling' ” didn't match the linked source and had to be changed.

This is the second time today someone had had to replace your title with the actual published title.

Please do not alter titles of any published material. Thanks.

[xtinct]

dang... and just today Connecticut passed some dingbat law against auto emissions to halt global warming...

It'll probably take 10 years to get the message to the politicians in Connecticut == global warming scare brought to you by Al Gore was a hoax... BUT Al's happy. He made a shitload of dough on the project.

Meanwhile... back at the ranch... Tonto describe as a door knob fell into the Lone Ranger's hand...

[Publius6961]

'Global Warming Will Stop,' New Peer-Reviewed Study Says

BS!
Unless the statement refers to the endless cycle of earth's warming and cooling, since the earth was created.

The thing is, no one yet can prove what causes these cycles.

Models are the toys of non thinkers, and it's like trying to "predict" the stock market; or the success of college for a three-year-old. There are simply too many variables to "model" to make that possible. And each error or omission is mutiplied by the following ones, until the result is meaningless.

The only claim that may be answerable in the future, is the extent that man has on the changes, if any. Non-significant contribution is hardly a good reason to return to the stone age, and the society of the "noble" but pretty much useless savage.

[Ronaldus Magnus Reagan]

The Michael Mann disinformation campaign takes a serious hit!

[tbw2]

Models are based on mathematical assumptions. Computational fluid flow dynamics, for example. But I can’t tweak those models to start and stop when I expect unless the model is running off of assumptions, not data.
It is like your budget - the actual cash flow draining down, or your mythical budget where you spend the raise on the assumption it will be there.
Most people think the models are on real accounting, when they are actually based on mythical numbers.

[Thickman]

ping - the skeptics are starting to speak up more forcefully. How long can the MSM and, more importantly right-thinking politicians, ignore this trend in intellectual thought and science?

[Mogollon]

Algore should be sued for fraud and the IPCC “scientists” should be axed.