To: Daniel T. Zanoza
One more time: the OJ case was a celebrity prosecution, a mess, a circus and the state failed to prove guilt. He may very well have done it, but that's not what the jury had to decide. Not "jury nullification," reasonable doubt.
2 posted on
05/03/2008 1:40:48 PM PDT by
Grut
To: Grut
In the OJ case, there was a total absence of evidence pointing to anyone OTHER than OJ. Of course, it wasn’t jury nullification, it was bigorty.
The Woim
4 posted on
05/03/2008 1:47:38 PM PDT by
The Woim
(Agitating for social change: Abolish all gun laws NOW! Abolish the Dept of Education!)
To: Grut
I've always felt that OJ was both guilty and framed.
11 posted on
05/03/2008 3:49:07 PM PDT by
Bobarian
(Green: It's the new Red.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson