Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PercivalWalks

If neither partner is a man, how the hell is the judge supposed to know which one to shaft?


2 posted on 04/23/2008 12:14:55 PM PDT by steve-b (Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b

The one who didn’t give birth.


3 posted on 04/23/2008 12:27:39 PM PDT by tbw2 ("Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" by Tamara Wilhite - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

That would be the child, who is both the victim and pawn of this little circus and large agenda.


6 posted on 04/23/2008 12:56:02 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

Legally the one who did not actually bare the child has no standing before the court, and frankly should not.

Deciding which biological or adoptive parent (and I can’t think of a case where an adoptive parent won over a biological parent when it came to custody, maybe one or two out there where biological was abusive or drug addict or something, but I can’t think of one) gets a child is one thing... arguing one that has no biological or adoptive claim is opening an entire can of worms.

This woman has no standing before the court, nor should.. if the court sets a precident like this, than anyone can come along and lay claim to anothers child, for any reason whatsoever.


7 posted on 04/23/2008 12:58:35 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson