Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mdittmar

Being a civilian without military experience, having people with serious felony convictions against them in the armed forces doesn’t seem like a good idea. At least on the face of it. I’ll accept the judgement of someone with experience, though.


11 posted on 04/21/2008 12:49:51 PM PDT by SwedishConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SwedishConservative
Being a civilian without military experience
Well,that makes two of us,but I know about dems.
12 posted on 04/21/2008 1:01:11 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: SwedishConservative

Being that we are 50 States with more than 3000 Counties, one needs to recognize that the law, and it’s penalties, are not the same or evenly applied throughout the Country.

What might be a Felony is Georgia, for example, might only be a misdemeanor in California. And vice versa. A good example would be the Genarlow Wilson case. Convicted of a felony and sent to prison for having consensual sex with a minor (15), and he was also a minor (17) at the time. And there are many, many examples of this.

(the real kicker in the Wilson case is he only had oral sex with her, if he had intercourse, it would have been a misdemeanor. Instead he was convicted of aggravated child molestation and that carried a mandatory sentence OF TEN YEARS.)
I have no problem with allowing convicts to help protect us, as long as they have been vetted.


15 posted on 04/21/2008 1:32:41 PM PDT by papasmurf (Unless I post a link to resource, what I post is opinion, regardless of how I spin it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson