[Soliton]

Correction, “An atheist versus a believer thing”

[nmh]

Evolutionists are atheists.

By stating that evolutionists are atheists is not making the argument around “religion”. He doesn't say that creationist USE “religion” for their validation and they DO NOT use “religion” to validate how they see Creation. SCIENCE does support CREATION. It is evolutionists that WANT TO MAKE THE ARGUMENT ABOUT “RELIGION”.

Apparently you hear what you want to hear.

What YOU should do is see the movie. All Ben is saying is that the PREMISE of an evolutionist is, is there is NO GOD. The PREMISE of an "Intelligent Designer" is that there is a GOD. The evidence for "Intelligent Design" is NOT about religion. The EVIDENCE for "Intelligent Design" is about SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. It is the unbelievers, atheists, evolutionists that INSIST on framing the argument about "religion" and NOT SCIENCE.

[Sursum Corda]

No, he said, to paraphrase , it is a totalitarian vs freedom thing. Think about it.

Sursum Corda

[God'sgrrl]

Although it’s important to note that the film does not specifically advocate biblical creation nor discuss our Designer, what it does do is offer overwhelming evidence that Darwinism is dogma masquerading as science, and that suppression of academic freedom is what is keeping Darwinism in place.

Answers in Genesis re: Expelled

[Hacksaw]

Have you heard we invaded Iraq?

[Bellflower]

ping