[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

That’s why science is taught in science class, and religious studies such as intelligent design are studied elsewhere. It’s simply too important for our country to be on top of the world scientifically to corrupt scientific methodology to satisfy the desires of those who don’t want a possible contradition to their theory of creation.,

The corruption comes from the scientific community itself. Evolution, Global Warming and other assorted promoters of "Junk Science".

[tacticalogic]

The corruption comes from the scientific community itself. Evolution, Global Warming and other assorted promoters of "Junk Science".

Would you mind sharing with us who you envision as assuming the authority to peer reveiw scientific work for the correct theological references?

[onguard]

“The corruption comes from the scientific community itself. Evolution, Global Warming and other assorted promoters of “Junk Science”.”

Scientists become famous when they can show that a popular theory is wrong. Anyone who could show that the theory of evolution was wrong would be as famous as Einstein became by showing that Newton’s theory of gravitation was wrong.

It strikes me as a bit strange that you and others who criticize of the theory of evolution as a junk theory do not raise similar objections to the teaching of string theory in physics, or perhaps quantum mechanics, which even Einstein was unable to accept. It makes me suspicious that the reasons for your antipathy towards the theory of evolution has less to do with the evidence for the theory and rather more to do with the way it conflicts with what you want to believe.