No - evolution is science.
“No - evolution is science”
Yesterday you stated that evoltion is a theory.
Now today it is science.
Both the Big Bang THEROY and The THEROY of Evoltion are just that .
THEROIES, nothing more. Just something to talk about.
BTW, name three things you believe in that are conseravtive values.
Sorry, but evolution, and the origin of life, is not science because it hasn't been proven. Species variation, yes, crossing o different species, no. You can deny that all you want but it won't make it true. Evolution is based on faith, it is also held as absolute truth by the people who believe it and they will book no debate on it, even though the original theory has been modified several times to try to cover up big glitches between the theory and reality.
As for how life started on Earth, it cannot have started the way(some)scientists have outlined, they know this so now they are trying to gloss over it by saying life came to earth on an asteroid or meteor from out in space somewhere.
This is supposed to stop the questions about how life started, completely ignoring the fact that even if life came here on some hunk of rock it still had to START somewhere and they haven't answered how it started. It didn't start the way it has been outlined, this is a known fact, spin all you want but it is true that life didn't start the way evolutionists say it did.
In order to believe in the origin of life and evolution according to Neo-Darwinists, and other branches of Darwin, one has to have faith because there is no proof, this makes it a religion, not a science.
I am not a Christian by the way, nor a member of any religion at all, but I do NOT believe in the theory of evolution the way it is laid out now, there is to much evidence to suggest it just didn't happen that way.
Have we demonstrated macro-evolution actually happened? Please give examples.