Skip to comments.
(Ralph)Nader on 9/11. Nader on Ron Paul.
Third Party Watch ^
Posted on 04/15/2008 12:11:30 PM PDT by mnehring
On 9/11: Ralph Nader, the consumer activist and independent presidential candidate, seems to think that the report of the commission assigned to investigate the events of 9-11 should not be the last word.
“There are unanswered questions in the 9-11 investigation, and they should be answered,” Nader said at a recent address at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. “How do you go from plausibility to evidence? You have a more independent inquiry.”
On the morning of September 11, 2001, airliners collided with each of the twin towers of New York City’s World Trade Center, after which they and a third nearby office building mysteriously collapsed. Other incidents on the same day at the Pentagon and in a field in Pennsylvania were also attributed to aircraft collisions. All were pitched by the government as the result of a terrorist conspiracy, although it is widely believed that the government may have played a direct role in orchestrating the events.
On Ron Paul:
On another topic, Nader had kind words to say for presidential candidate, Ron Paul.
“Ron Paul is very good on foreign policy,” he said. “He’s a refreshing voice.”
Nader also praised Paul for his outspoken opposition to the aggressive U.S. stance against Iran and the so-called ‘war-on-drugs.’
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
04/15/2008 12:11:31 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehrling
Nader for President
Because we've never had a president named Ralph
2
posted on
04/15/2008 12:12:46 PM PDT
by
Snardius
To: mnehrling
Nader is a Truther?
Why am I not surprised?
3
posted on
04/15/2008 12:15:45 PM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(In small-town Pennsylvania, bitter ignorant anti-immigrant rednecks cling to guns & religion...BO)
To: Snardius
Aren’t a Jimmy and a Bill enough? Do we really need a Ralph?
4
posted on
04/15/2008 12:19:10 PM PDT
by
brooklyn dave
(Proud to be an Infidel)
To: mnehrling
Nader admires Paul’s foreign policy. Is anyone surprised?
5
posted on
04/15/2008 12:29:19 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: mnehrling
Nader admires Paul’s foreign policy. Is anyone surprised?
6
posted on
04/15/2008 12:29:19 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: mnehrling
"after which they and a third nearby office building mysteriously collapsed."
Wrong. There's nothing mysterious about uncontrolled fires combined with severe structural damage collapsing steel structures. This is a classic dangerous conspiracist's propaganda yarn.
"Other incidents on the same day at the Pentagon and in a field in Pennsylvania were also attributed to aircraft collisions."
"Attributed" my *ss. Too bad these nutjobs don't have the guts to make these snide remarks to the faces of the 86 families that had loved ones on these two flights. I'd love to watch them get a mouth full of teeth, just like the time a nutjob had the audacity confront Buzz Aldrin about Apollo. After all, this kind of insinuation naturally implies the victims' families are lying and their loved ones were somehow involved in the plot.
"All were pitched by the government as the result of a terrorist conspiracy, although it is widely believed that the government may have played a direct role in orchestrating the events."
Pitched by the government? Lie. The "government" did not force Osama to take responsibility on tape. Widely believed? Lie. Funny how nutjobs fantasize about not being a minority with extremist beliefs. They had to design and pay for a skewed zogby poll just to try to set their minds at ease. Sadly for them, a later zogby poll that directly asked how many thought Bush was directly involved in 9/11 only got a 4.2% "yes" vote. Widely believed? Hardly.
To: mnehrling
And then we will need an inquiry to answer the unanswered questions raised by Nadar’s investigation, and then an inquiry into that investigation, and, following that, an inquiry into that next investigation,and then an inquiry . . .
8
posted on
04/15/2008 12:39:42 PM PDT
by
YHAOS
To: mnehrling
although it is widely believed that the government may have played a direct role in orchestrating the events. LOL. Thirty goofy moonbats widely believe it.
9
posted on
04/15/2008 12:43:54 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: mnehrling
On the morning of September 11, 2001, airliners collided with each of the twin towers of New York Citys World Trade Center, after which they and a third nearby office building mysteriously collapsed. Other incidents on the same day at the Pentagon and in a field in Pennsylvania were also attributed to aircraft collisions.OK, I know that the WTC buildings were a controlled demolition, and the pentagon was hit by an American missle, but what the hell happened in a field in Pennsylvania if it wasn't a plane crash? Did the field spontaneously combust? Probably. Bush is that evil!
10
posted on
04/15/2008 12:47:52 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
I saw the imprint of a fuselage with two wings. Though I've never seen that before, it couldn't have been anything but a plane.
11
posted on
04/15/2008 1:05:07 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: mnehrling
“although it is widely believed that the government may have played a direct role in orchestrating the events. “
Yes, but the NEOCONS will cover this up just like they covered up the raping of that black girl by those Duke Lacross players./s
To: mnehrling
Vote Nader.
Make Amreica Ralph.
13
posted on
04/15/2008 2:10:01 PM PDT
by
TBP
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson