Posted on 04/07/2008 10:31:29 PM PDT by pissant
Like other readers of this blog, I received an email today from Montgomery Sibley, the distinguished, independent-minded lawyer who practices in Washington DC. Larry Sinclair had provided him with all the evidence he has to support his allegations that when Barack Obama was a member of the Illinois Senate he met twice with Larry Sinclair in in November 1999 in Chicago, obtained cocaine for the both of them and consumed it (crack cocaine smoked through a glass pipe in the Senator’s case). On both occasions they also participated in consensual sexual acts with each other.
After studying and analyzing the evidence, some of which Larry has never revealed to the public, Montgomery Sibley undertook to represent Larry on a contingency-fee basis. This means that he will not be paid any fees by his client but can claim a percentage of any monetary award the courts may order.
On 1st April 2008, Justice Henry Kennedy of the DC District Court responded positively to the first motion filed by Montgomery Sibley since he took the case. He authorized that subpoenas could be issued to discover the real identity and addresses of a number of posters on the Internet who have tried to undermine Larry Sinclair’s allegations by attacking him personally.
I am happy to share Montgomery Sibley’s’ s letter with you. But I would be happier if you had already received your own letter directly from him. Because that would mean that you had contributed to the legal fund - in however large or small amount.
The legal fund is a trust fund controlled by the lawyer. It is used exclusively to pay disbursements - not fees. Disbursements are those out-of-pocket expenses which arise in every legal action. They can include court filing fees, the cost of serving subpoenas, distribution of copies of documents to interested parties and the cost of research. If the fund were to have a surplus when the legal actions are over - the surplus would be returned to the donors. These costs are critical. If the fund runs dry, subpoenas cannot be served. Much time can be lost, And in this matter time really is of the essence.
Because of the sensitive nature of this matter, the lawyer has emphasized that the identity of donors will be treated in complete confidence.
I am not going to comment on the legal strategy I think that Montgomery Sibley and Larry Sinclair are pursing. But would remind everyone that the Watergate Affair began with a brief report of a break-in of the Democratic offices in the Watergate complex.
It is significant that it is Larry Sinclair and not Barack Obama or his supporters who is willing to take a lie-detector test, make sworn affidavits and submit himself to discovery and cross-examination in the courts in full awareness of the penalties for perjury. Nobody has to serve subpoenas to discover who Larry Sinclair is.
I do not have a horse in the Presidential race, but like many others around the world, am very interested in the process being open and fair. Larry Sinclair is not a rich man - he appears to be of modest means and uncertain physical health. He has shown much personal courage in subjecting himself to the derision and wrath of Obama supporters. And the mainstream media seems to be cowering in the bunkers.
It has been interesting to see how Larry has derived renewed strength from the participants on this blog who have become his special support group overcoming the odds to get his story into the public domain and fighting off those who have tried to silence him through intimidation.
What price freedom speech in America? What price victory? The price of a cup of coffee, or of a magazine, or a good meal - and for some who can afford it - the price of a tank full of gas?
Some of you have already been way more generous than I have been. But its not the relative amount you can afford to donate but the fact that you contribute something. Your contribution not only pays the urgent bills but also shows your commitment to freedom of speech and the search for justice.
Thanks for taking the time
Victor
Apparently has a soft spot for gay white coke snorting dudes.
On the down LOW?... Get out of here?...
Could be the Oct. surprise
I sure hope so. Larry better watch his back, or he may commit an Obamacide like Donald Young.
What Donald Had To Say (Obama’s murdered choir director & Larry Sinclair)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1994726/posts
Choir conductor found murdered (From Obama’s church, Dec 2007)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1993099/posts
BUMP!
Go, Larry, GO!
He was approved for discovery by the federal judge in DC. Must have been a Clinton appointee. ROFL
And also, the Watergate break-in had....oh, what do you call those things? Oh, yeah -- arrests.
Wake me up when you have a mug shot of Obama. Until then, enjoy your evidence-free dead-end circle jerk, starring a publicity hound who is nothing without people gullible enough to believe in him because they want to so badly.
Sure thing ace. It is soooooo far out in left field for a sleazy scumbag politician to do drugs and get a BJ, I can see why you would never believe such a thing.
And just why was slick impeached? and how long was it after Paula Jones surfaced? Thought so.
But good to see you defending Obama’s honor, yet again.
And just why was slick impeached? and how long was it after Paula Jones surfaced? Thought so.
You may want to try checking your facts before you go off half-cocked; it makes you look smarter. I hear they got this thing called "The Inter-net" where you can do this. Here's what I found out:
But good to see you defending Obama’s honor, yet again.
Get your head out of Sinclair's posterior and smell the coffee -- there is NO reason to believe this idiot UNTIL HE BRINGS SOME MADDOG EVIDENCE. He's got NOTHING but you want it to be true so badly, you're trying to convince yourself and other people based on NOTHING.
You're like Patsy Ramsey, who really, really wanted to believe that John Mark Karr killed JonBenet when, in reality, he was just a sick little twerp with a screw loose and an overwhelming need for attention, even if it was in the form of hatred. Even worse, you're just as delusional as people who believe Obama is qualified to be President.
Wasn’t Patsy Ramsey already dead when John Mark Carr claimed to have killed JonBenet?
Amazing. For someone who knows so little about the situation, you seem pretty sure of yourself that Obama is above this type of behavior.
And FWIW, you might want to check your obviously superior sources to see what the status of Sinclair’s lawsuit against the internet defamers (dem operatives) is. He was granted a motion for discovery by the DC District Court. MEANING that he will get have to show that these defamers are lying about him and his claims about Obama.
Stay tuned, sally. You might learn somnething
Someone here wrote: “Get your head out of Sinclair’s posterior and smell the coffee — there is NO reason to believe this idiot UNTIL HE BRINGS SOME MADDOG EVIDENCE. He’s got NOTHING but you want it to be true so badly, you’re trying to convince yourself and other people based on NOTHING.”
Sinclair states that he has a lot more to say. I’ll just bet that he does. He has a first-rate Washington, D.C. attorney, I hear. I know that the attorney and Sinclair requested the phone records of Donald Young. I just wonder if the phone records corroborate Sinclair’s story that Young contacted him several times, which for reasons Sinclair states, he would not be able to do without getting his phone number from Obama or the Obama campaign.
Sinclair was granted a motion for discovery so there is definitely something there for the judge to rule in this way. Was it phone records?
I listened to 3 interviews with Larry Sinclair. I’ve read hundreds of his comments on his youtube site. If I were to place odds on if he is being truthful, I’d say at this point it is about a 85% probability, in my book.
On Sinclair’s blog I read about three murders of gays which many say are related, Donald Young’s among them. (The victims were Larry Bland, Nathaniel Spencer, and Donald Young). I saw the rapid disappearance of virtually all of the information about that on the Internet in a short period of time. Somthing is afoot. It’s like the muderer(?s)’ mopping up all the blood and fingerprints at the crime scene.
I think this needs to be factored into Larry Sinclair’s story when trying to assess its credibility.
Hey, pissant -- may I call you "piss?" -- Just who is it that is NOT "above this type of behavior"?
It wasn't too long ago that some people thought Ted Haggard was far above it, but he turned out not to be. Ditto David Vitter, the guy who replaced Bob Livingston, the Speaker-designate who resigned from Congress after admitting his extramarital affair. If anyone thought that Mr. Clean-Law-&-Order-Fearless-Leader Eliot Spitzer was above whoring around, they probably didn't think he would be stone cold stupid enough to make the same type of mistakes that Jerry Springer made thirty years ago.
One thing is certain; we can't count on ANYONE in public to be as pristine as their image. I don't care if it's Mitt Romney, Ronald Reagan, Billy Graham or the Pope himself; all are fallible, sinful, and less than worthy of the worship that often comes their way.
you might want to check your obviously superior sources to see what the status of Sinclair’s lawsuit against the internet defamers (dem operatives) is. He was granted a motion for discovery by the DC District Court. MEANING that he will get have to show (sic) that these defamers are lying about him and his claims about Obama.
Uh huh. He's serving as his own attorney, and you know what they say about someone who does that. He's going to be awfully busy trying to prove to polygraph experts he's not a liar while proving that Democrats who tell HIS dirty little secrets ARE liars.
Regarding Obama, you have fallen into the trap that many Clintonphobes did years ago; just because they all are dishonest, duplicitous, hypocritical slimy weasels, you'll believe ANYTHING anyone says against them even it if doesn't make a lick of sense. You may have heard some moonbat nonsense about a plot to create a phony national emergency that would give President Bush an excuse to suspend the November elections, and remain in the White House in an America under martial law. This past March marked my tenth year as a registered Freeper, and I remember as if yesterday the threads suggesting that Clinton was going to do exactly the same thing in 2000, especially after the Millennium bomb plot was foiled. Thankfully, those idiots have mostly moved on from FR to drink the Kool-Aid served up in Alex Jones-town (hello, Michael Rivero!). Good riddance.
You have to be deliberately dense to believe that Sinclair doesn't have credibility problems that are almost insurmountable. Is Obama full of crap? No doubt about it. Has his reputation sunk below the level of a loser like Sinclair? Absolutely not.
No -- Karr anonymously corresponded with people investigating the case that kept touch with Patsy Ramsey. Supposedly, in believing Karr's tall tale of having slain JonBenet, the dying Patsy found comfort in knowing what had actually happened -- or so she thought. It was after Patsy's death that Karr -- thought to be the real killer by myopic Colorado detectives -- actually was tracked down in Thailand.
Personally, I am cheering for Obama’s gay lover/cocaine buddy, Larry Sinclair, to relentelessly pursue Obama until Obama’s reputation is at the bottom of the sea and his political career is wiped out forever. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving individual.
Go, Larry, GO!
Jennifer, meet "someone." It's customary to ping someone when quoting them in a response.
Sinclair states that he has a lot more to say. I’ll just bet that he does. He has a first-rate Washington, D.C. attorney, I hear.
You're referring to Montgomery Blair Sibley. As a matter of fact, the Washington Post wrote about Mr. First Rate back in May of 2007:
While this 50-year-old scion of the highborn has recently been suggesting that he could make public the names of the 10,000 in order to protect his client Deborah Jeane Palfrey, he had to pay less attention to urgent business in two other places.One was Florida, where the state bar was seeking to yank his license for at least two years. He was found guilty in absentia (in part for being a "vexatious litigant") and now faces suspension if not disbarment. "He is someone who abuses the legal process," says Barnaby Min, counsel for the Florida Bar.
The second was in Montgomery County, where he was to stand trial for failing to pay $11,218.20 in past-due rent on office space in Gaithersburg for a tiny shipping-crate company he heads. That trial was continued.
Something is amiss here, and we haven't even gotten to the part where he sued the U.S. Supreme Court for treason (twice!), asking for $1 million in damages. Or that he spent 77 days in a Miami jail for refusing to pay child support. Or that Maryland has stopped him from running a law office in the state. Or that federal prosecutors in Palfrey's case say Sibley's filings are so ignorant of basic legal tenets that they are "almost incoherent."
(snip)
About his divorce, back in 1994: Sibley had been married for 13 years. It didn't seem to end well.
"I've filed more than 60 lawsuits. It's a little hard to put in a nutshell."
According to court files, Sibley once threatened his wife: "We will litigate until I am disbarred and bankrupt if necessary."
Barbara Sibley could not be reached for comment for this article. The court file says the ordeal started when Blair Sibley left the Miami area, triggering $4,000 per month in child-support payments, which he failed to make. The 77 days in jail eventually followed.
Among the dozens of defendants Sibley has sued in the wake of the divorce are the Florida Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
"This case exposed a real abuse of the family court system," he says. "Some have called my filings themselves to be abusive. I don't. I consider it my patriotic duty to expose a horrible system."
He filed so many suits against so many people, almost all of them immediately dismissed, that Florida courts ordered the clerk's office not to accept any more filings from him relating to the divorce unless another member of the Florida Bar also signed the complaint. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit said his suits amounted to a "multi-headed leviathan of meritless litigation."
Yeah. First rate, all the way. Just like Larry Sinclair.
“Uh huh. He’s serving as his own attorney”.
As I said, for someone who knows so little about the story. I’ll fill you in someday.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
