Skip to comments.
Voting 'no' on Hillary, Obama and McCain: Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?
WorldNetDaily ^
| March 24, 2008
| Staff
Posted on 03/24/2008 9:38:28 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: Taxman; Ladycalif; chicagolady; Delphinium; Gelato; MountainFlower; roamer_1; Steve Schulin; ...
The whole article is a long read, but worth it.
2
posted on
03/24/2008 9:40:44 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: EternalVigilance
Bloomberg gave up on his plan to go independent for one reason: Americans do not want a 3rd party candidate.
America wants McCain over anyone else, and that’s what counts.
To: EternalVigilance
Among those joining in the effort are presidential candidate Alan Keyes, American Minute founder Bill Federer, Council for National Policy member Bob Fischer, Minuteman national executive Director Al Garza, Constitution Party founder Howard Phillips, Gun Owners of American executive director Larry Pratt, Minuteman Civil Defense Corps founder Chris Simcox, Operation Save America founder Flip Benham and dozens of others.
Couldn’t find anybody sane?
4
posted on
03/24/2008 9:42:28 PM PDT
by
Patrick1
To: CounterCounterCulture; outlawcam; joanie-f; Badray; Blue Collar Republican
5
posted on
03/24/2008 9:43:03 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: reagandissiple
America wants McCain over anyone else, and that’s what counts. What about you?
6
posted on
03/24/2008 9:44:19 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: Patrick1
Count me among the insane then. Though I think it is the other way around. I think it is insane to vote for McCain in the vain hope that he is better than the other two.
7
posted on
03/24/2008 9:44:26 PM PDT
by
Ingtar
(Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
To: Patrick1
Couldn’t find anybody sane? It's always the crazy folks who gotta pull you sane people out of the fire.
8
posted on
03/24/2008 9:45:48 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: reagandissiple
Bloomberg gave up on his plan to go independent for one reason: Americans do not want a 3rd party candidate. Actually he gave it up because there's already going to be four liberals on the ballot in November.
9
posted on
03/24/2008 9:48:03 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: EternalVigilance
A conservative third party candidate will not work unless there are countervailing liberal third parties that dilute the votes in a general presidential election, which would give the conservative 3rd party a chance to win. So the answer is no to a third party... for now.
To: Red Steel
Nader is running independent, and the crazy lady, Cynthia McKinney, is going to be on the Green Party ballot.
11
posted on
03/24/2008 9:49:13 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: AFA-Michigan
12
posted on
03/24/2008 9:51:11 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?Has former president Ross Perot weighed in on this?
To: EternalVigilance
Will the Presidential ballots be marked with “None of the Above”?
I feel like I woke up in the Bizarro World.
14
posted on
03/24/2008 9:54:09 PM PDT
by
exit82
(People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
To: EternalVigilance
I doubt that the Green Party and Nader will win enough votes to justify a serious conservative 3rd party run in this upcoming presidential election.
To: EternalVigilance
Hillary/Nader 2009- Consensus is in--- NO FURTHER DEBATE, Pleeese!
16
posted on
03/24/2008 9:55:03 PM PDT
by
Mark
(REMEMBER: Mean spirited, angry remarks against my postings won't feed even one hungry child.)
To: EternalVigilance
without the crossover voting allowed in primaries would mccain have won the GOP nomination ?
17
posted on
03/24/2008 9:55:15 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Ingtar
Okay. Here we go again. For the Duncan Hunter crowd on Free Republic some questions and observations. Who is the candidate of this new party? Keyes? Hunter? J.D. Hayworth? Come on what a bunch of crap. What is the point of having a candidate who will get fewer votes than Ralph Nader?
It is really a serious observation to say that McCain is the same as the corrupt Hillary Clinton and the socialist Hussein? Is McCain's position on the war against Islamo Fascism the same as Clinton's and Obama’s? If the answer is no then we don't need a third losing party.
18
posted on
03/24/2008 9:55:26 PM PDT
by
Patrick1
To: smoothsailing
I, for one, could care less what Ross Perot thinks. He was never a conservative.
Actually, now that you mention it, though, John McCain reminds me of Perot.
19
posted on
03/24/2008 9:55:41 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The first front in any war is the war of words.)
To: Red Steel
All they need, or want, to do is pull enough votes in Florida and California to seem relevant.
And that just may happen, especially in Florida.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson