To: Xenalyte; RMDupree; AlexW; CzarNicky; Mike Fieschko; motzman; codercpc; thingumbob; tje; ml1954; ...
2 posted on
03/02/2008 3:03:21 PM PST by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List ---The BIGGEST on the FR!!!)
To: PJ-Comix
Arrghh. What a limp-wristed, pencil-neck geek. I’m starting to realize that most Democrats are pure narcissists.
To: PJ-Comix
“Well, you can call me Rae, or you can call me Jay, or you can call me Jay Rae, or you can call me Gay... but ya doesn’t hafta yet call me Mr. President...”
14 posted on
03/02/2008 3:52:25 PM PST by
mikrofon
(No Way)
To: PJ-Comix
Into the top 20 like Mark Martin!
18 posted on
03/02/2008 4:03:53 PM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
To: PJ-Comix
The Democrat party decides to vest these "super delegates" with a disproportionate amount of power in deciding their candidate and then hand one of those votes out to a child?
I don't know what confounds me more about them: How they've disenfranchised the common man they once claimed to represent or how the general election can even be a contest.
31 posted on
03/03/2008 2:14:41 AM PST by
Paul Heinzman
(This Koolaid is tastes kinda funny to me.)
To: PJ-Comix
Uncommitted stupid delegate? He committed to stupidity and gay programs.
32 posted on
03/03/2008 4:22:50 AM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(Both dim candidates promise change and/or hope. I don't think the USA can afford their message.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson