Posted on 02/29/2008 9:01:49 AM PST by AuntB
So, I guess I win? Or will the next thing I get be a citation? I'm just waiting now ........
So, half of your neighborhood got nice paved roads at taxpayer expense, while the other half is stuck on crappy gravel roads.
And the response of those who received the largesse of the government is to get mad at the half who did not.
If your entire neighborhood was still gravel, your maintenance costs would be double, driving up your dues. By getting the state to take over some roads, you ALL saved money.
We go through this a lot with our pool. People who don’t have kids, or who don’t use the pool, who have access to other pools, want to pay less in dues because they don’t need the pool.
Last year a developer approached us about adding his small neighborhood into our association. It would essentially have been free money for us, because our pool is underutilized anyway. But his homes were going to have street lights (we don’t), and so a PORTION of the dues from those new houses would have paid for the operation and maintenance of the street lights. We still would have come out ahead.
But there was an outcry because the new homes would have street lights that “we were all paying for”, while the rest of the homes were also stuck paying for their own house lamps on poles.
I think the development fell apart anyway, but we had people ready to give up free money because they perceived an “unfairness”.
i was in the process of purchasing a lake lot when just by chance the president of the homeowners association drove up. This lot was next to a trailer house on one side and a dilapidated house on the other side. At this chance meeting I was informed that the rules said I had to build a three bedroom brick house with a two car garage. Any one already an owner were grandfathered in. So these aholes voted these new standards in which makes their property values sky rocket and forces any new buyers to over build their lots. Needless to say I backed out of that deal.
So, you moved into a neighborhood where they had a rule that your trash can had to be stored out of sight.
But in your case, you can’t do that because you can’t move it past the air conditioning units.
And having explained that to the people you elect to run your community, they agreed with your dilemna and decided to let you be.
And you are upset about it?
BTW, if any of you don’t like what your HOA does, run for election, find others in your community to agree with you and run for election, take over the board, and do what you think is right.
In a lot of neighborhoods, you have to pull teeth to get people to serve on the boards. But you might find that a majority of your neighbors LIKE the government they get from the HOA, and will not support you.
“By getting the state to take over some roads, you ALL saved money.”
No. The county has always maintained the paved roads. It’s simply a sham. It’s the owners choice if he buys on a gravel road, why should I pay for it?
The problem we have with the HOA where we live now is that a lot of the homeowners don’t pay their dues. If they ever go to sell the dues have to be brought up to date but a lot of the people either die or abandon their property and the dues are never paid.
Apparently, you could have bought a house on the gravel road if you wanted to come out “ahead”. I hope though a moment’s thought would allow you to understand that if you moved to a house on a gravel road that you would NOT come out ahead, because you would pay exactly the same money you are paying now, but would have a crappy gravel road instead of a nicely paved road.
The fact is that the people on the paved roads and gravel roads pay the same in taxes, and pay the same in HOA. Those on the paved roads have a nice paved road, and therefore are better off than those in the gravel roads. And if the county didn’t maintain your paved road, you’d still pay the same tax but your HOA dues would go UP to cover the increased cost of maintaining the paved road.
It does not look like those on the paved road are being taken advantage of. It looks like they are better off than their gravel road counterparts.
Apparently your government has a rule that it will maintain private roads if they are paved. By paving parts of the road, the developer managed to lower the overall HOA fees, by passing off work to the government.
That isn’t an inconvenience to those who live on the paved road, it’s a benefit.
Maybe the people on the gravel roads should be insisting that the HOA fees be raised so that they can get the same paved roads as those who already have them. THEN the county will maintain all the roads, and everybody will get the same treatment.
We are having that problem now with foreclosures. I’ve never seen the backlog of dues as high as it is.
But if we manage to maintain our neighborhood, and can keep the remaining homeowners from letting their properties deteriorate, we hope we can eventually get those houses sold and collect the back dues.
In the meantime, we are cutting back on some services, and not replenishing our reserves as much as we would like.
Wow. Not surprising from you. Are you sure you’re not a democrat?
Why not buy some astroturf and throw it over the trash can on the side of your house when you're not using it? then it would just look like a part of the yard, or a small shrub.
I've got two old cracked trash cans sitting out by the curb for the last month cause I can't figure out how to get the garbage men to actually take them as trash.
No, I'm not upset about it. I WAS upset that they were bugging me about it when I gave every effort to keep it out of sight and my neighbor kept his in front of his garage and received nothing from them. The issue now seems to be resolved, unless the rep just meant that they wouldn't send more letters but would just fine me.
Get a bigger can, Dave, and put them in that. ;o)
Here’s another irony. This HOA refuses doing any enforcement. Anything goes.
“People who dont have kids, or who dont use the pool, who have access to other pools, want to pay less in dues because they dont need the pool.”
My! What a novel concept. Shame on them!
Split Foyer? Yes, that’s bad, but I’m guessing it’s the developers’ fault.
Bottom line, their property, their right. Too bad for having someone “bring down my property value” next door.
Can’t figure it out?
Take a fat Sharpie and write in big letters all over the side, “TRASH - PLEASE TAKE”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.