Whitehouse.com stops payment to Larry Sinclair

The Way it Is ^ | 2/28/08 | staff

[pissant]

I obtained this through an email from Mr. Sinclair;

Mr. Dan Parisi, President WhiteHouse.com 295 Greenwich Street, Ste 184 New York, New York 10007-1049

RE: Returned Check

Dear Mr. Parisi,

Be advised that Lisa Brooks and Myself were notified by US Bank of Duluth this afternoon that Walden Federal (the bank in which Whitehouse.com Check Number 2046 is drawn on) has notified them a STOP PAYMENT was placed on your fee payment of $20,000.00 dated 2-21-08.

I have contacted the Financial Crimes Division of the Duluth Police Department this date concerning this matter. US Bank as informed Ms. Brooks and myself that the check has not yet been physically returned to them unpaid, but that if it is it will be returned to me by March 7, 2008.

I am asking that US Bank provide documentation showing Walden Federal has notified them the check is no good and I will begin the criminal complaint process against you and Whitehouse.com immediately upon receipt of the US Bank documentation.

Ms. Brooks and I will be charged for your dis-honored check and those charges will be included in the criminal complaint against you.

I have given you more than ample opportunity to honor your word and the agreement we had, especially seeing how you have received and engaged in using the very results of the services you paid for. You have chosen to act as if you are above the law and that sir will no doubt be you down fall.

Again, you can avoid this criminal action against you and your company by contacting your financial institution and instructing them to honor the check.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Sinclair

[CIDKauf]

or 10 $1K money orders....lol

[tyke]

Who he? What’s wrong with posting the facts? Are you afraid of something?

[pissant]

You left out 2/3rds of the story.

[tyke]

A story that has been told ad nauseum here and fringe sites all over the internet. I mean, Rense, Reverse Speech? Come on. Alien abductees have more sense than that (but then, most of them have more credible stories than poor old Larry).

I see Larry has had the time to post another video on YouTube. It’s laughable that he thinks he will see a penny from Parisi by filing a criminal complaint or civil law suit. Why would Minnesota law enforcement be interested in a transaction that took place in California anyway?

I’ve got an idea, pissant. Since you obviously believe this guy, why don’t you call him up (his number has been plastered all over the internet) and ask him why he continues to fuss with trivial sums of money like $20k when one phone call to a bona fide news organization (not some ex-porn hack site like whitehouse.com) with solid evidence (which he keeps insisting he has) would make him an instant millionaire.

[drjimmy]

In this particular instance, the choice of pig is between Parisi and Sinclair.

[pissant]

It is only a non credible story to those who think Obama would do no such thing.

And the only ones following it closely fall into two camps. Those hoping Sinclair is being truthful and can help bring down the marxist dirtball, and those who are hoping he’s just a nutjob that won’t so much as scratch that sterling Obama reputation.