Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whitehouse.com stops payment to Larry Sinclair
The Way it Is ^ | 2/28/08 | staff

Posted on 02/28/2008 2:11:46 PM PST by pissant

I obtained this through an email from Mr. Sinclair;

Mr. Dan Parisi, President WhiteHouse.com 295 Greenwich Street, Ste 184 New York, New York 10007-1049

RE: Returned Check

Dear Mr. Parisi,

Be advised that Lisa Brooks and Myself were notified by US Bank of Duluth this afternoon that Walden Federal (the bank in which Whitehouse.com Check Number 2046 is drawn on) has notified them a STOP PAYMENT was placed on your fee payment of $20,000.00 dated 2-21-08.

I have contacted the Financial Crimes Division of the Duluth Police Department this date concerning this matter. US Bank as informed Ms. Brooks and myself that the check has not yet been physically returned to them unpaid, but that if it is it will be returned to me by March 7, 2008.

I am asking that US Bank provide documentation showing Walden Federal has notified them the check is no good and I will begin the criminal complaint process against you and Whitehouse.com immediately upon receipt of the US Bank documentation.

Ms. Brooks and I will be charged for your dis-honored check and those charges will be included in the criminal complaint against you.

I have given you more than ample opportunity to honor your word and the agreement we had, especially seeing how you have received and engaged in using the very results of the services you paid for. You have chosen to act as if you are above the law and that sir will no doubt be you down fall.

Again, you can avoid this criminal action against you and your company by contacting your financial institution and instructing them to honor the check.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Sinclair


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: larrysinclair; obama; parisi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The soap opera continues....
1 posted on 02/28/2008 2:11:49 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

For goodness sake. Larry flunked the polygraph, and has no other evidence or witnesses, which means he is a liar. We all wanted to see Obama in a nice juicy scandal but it is clear that Larry is just a disturbed, attention-seeking ‘ho.

Let it go.


2 posted on 02/28/2008 2:15:02 PM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Like sands through the hourglass, so are the Gays Of Our Lives.


3 posted on 02/28/2008 2:15:29 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Shaking head. What happens when a pornographer and a gay drug dealer sign a contract? Someone gets screwed.


4 posted on 02/28/2008 2:16:13 PM PST by Greg F (Do you want a guy named Hussein to fix your soul? Michelle Obama thinks you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Not quite, but you are free to ignore it. It is easier than keeping up with the details anyways.


5 posted on 02/28/2008 2:18:31 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Ha!


6 posted on 02/28/2008 2:18:56 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Was it in the agreement that the payment would be stopped if the polygraph did not pass muster?

I thought there was a bonus amount to be paid if it DID pass muster, was a penalty specified if it did not?

Larry may have a case for a broken contract.


7 posted on 02/28/2008 2:19:00 PM PST by weegee (Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F; pissant
Whitehouse.com is not a porn site?

What is the porn site I keep hearing paid for the test?

http://whitehouse.com/

8 posted on 02/28/2008 2:19:26 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Hillary has enough scandals that don’t get attention.

I want Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama exposed as Socialists and rejected at the polls by voters who oppose Socialism no matter how big it smiles.


9 posted on 02/28/2008 2:20:14 PM PST by weegee (Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Like G.B. Shaw said, “I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.”


10 posted on 02/28/2008 2:20:39 PM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

It was a porn site, then after he had made a lot of money he switched to being a political site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse.com


11 posted on 02/28/2008 2:20:49 PM PST by Greg F (Do you want a guy named Hussein to fix your soul? Michelle Obama thinks you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Ahhhhh, thanks for the info.


12 posted on 02/28/2008 2:22:25 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
Didn't they agree to pay him one amount just for taking the polygraph, and a larger amount if he passed it?

I thought he was supposed to get $10,000 just for taking the polygraph, and $100,000 if he passed the polygraph test.

I'm not sure where the $20,000 number came from, but if he took the polygraph, it would appear that Whitehouse owes him the amount they promised him.

13 posted on 02/28/2008 2:25:21 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

They promised him money to TAKE the test, not to PASS the test. Then, when they did the test, they stopped payment on the check.

That is all that is important for THIS part of the dispute.

As to the rest, they did not live up to their end of the arrangement, and there is some question whether he passed or failed the test, or even what that would mean. They claim his results showed “deceit”, but the 2nd expert’s report suggests he was telling the truth about aspects of the case.

There is some appearance that Obama got a front-group to pretend to be independent, offer Sinclair money, and run the test only so they could sabatoge the results and discredit him.


14 posted on 02/28/2008 2:50:39 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weegee

No. They renegotiated the day before. Instead of $10K for taking it, and 100K for passing it was 20K for taking and 10K to charity.


15 posted on 02/28/2008 4:05:43 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

It was originally a porn site. No longer.


16 posted on 02/28/2008 4:06:18 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

Who is the pig? Obama or Sinclair


17 posted on 02/28/2008 4:08:47 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Parisi canceled the checks after Sinclair accused him of taking money from Obama’s chief of staff to flunk Sinclair on his lie-detector test, and after Sinclair had threatened to arrange another test that same day (last Monday, I believe).

Since Sinclair had agreed not to take another test for four weeks, Parisi accused him of welshing on the agreement and stopped two of the three checks. I believe two $5000 checks to charities Sinclair nominated were not canceled.

Since Sinclair did not actually take another test, it’s possible that Parisi acted too hastily in canceling the checks, but given Sinclair’s comments about immediately taking another test and his ridiculous accusations (based on nothing but an anonymous phone call, or more likely his own imagination) I doubt Parisi is in any serious legal jeopardy. (Actually, no one being sued or accused by Sinclair at this point is in serious jeopardy!) They could also argue that Sinclair still got his $10k, but decided to give it to charity (depends on the wording of the written contract, if there was one).

At this point, even though Sinclair has finally produced one piece of hard evidence placing him in the Chicago area in 1999, nothing short of hard evidence placing Obama at the scene is going to rescue Sinclair from further ridicule and rejection.


18 posted on 02/28/2008 4:15:58 PM PST by tyke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tyke

Is that you, DearMurray?


19 posted on 02/28/2008 4:26:33 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Yo, Larry, repeat after me, certified check, certified check, certified check . . .


20 posted on 02/28/2008 5:49:29 PM PST by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson