Posted on 02/28/2008 2:11:46 PM PST by pissant
For goodness sake. Larry flunked the polygraph, and has no other evidence or witnesses, which means he is a liar. We all wanted to see Obama in a nice juicy scandal but it is clear that Larry is just a disturbed, attention-seeking ‘ho.
Let it go.
Like sands through the hourglass, so are the Gays Of Our Lives.
Shaking head. What happens when a pornographer and a gay drug dealer sign a contract? Someone gets screwed.
Not quite, but you are free to ignore it. It is easier than keeping up with the details anyways.
Ha!
Was it in the agreement that the payment would be stopped if the polygraph did not pass muster?
I thought there was a bonus amount to be paid if it DID pass muster, was a penalty specified if it did not?
Larry may have a case for a broken contract.
What is the porn site I keep hearing paid for the test?
Hillary has enough scandals that don’t get attention.
I want Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama exposed as Socialists and rejected at the polls by voters who oppose Socialism no matter how big it smiles.
Like G.B. Shaw said, “I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.”
It was a porn site, then after he had made a lot of money he switched to being a political site.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse.com
Ahhhhh, thanks for the info.
I thought he was supposed to get $10,000 just for taking the polygraph, and $100,000 if he passed the polygraph test.
I'm not sure where the $20,000 number came from, but if he took the polygraph, it would appear that Whitehouse owes him the amount they promised him.
They promised him money to TAKE the test, not to PASS the test. Then, when they did the test, they stopped payment on the check.
That is all that is important for THIS part of the dispute.
As to the rest, they did not live up to their end of the arrangement, and there is some question whether he passed or failed the test, or even what that would mean. They claim his results showed “deceit”, but the 2nd expert’s report suggests he was telling the truth about aspects of the case.
There is some appearance that Obama got a front-group to pretend to be independent, offer Sinclair money, and run the test only so they could sabatoge the results and discredit him.
No. They renegotiated the day before. Instead of $10K for taking it, and 100K for passing it was 20K for taking and 10K to charity.
It was originally a porn site. No longer.
Who is the pig? Obama or Sinclair
Parisi canceled the checks after Sinclair accused him of taking money from Obama’s chief of staff to flunk Sinclair on his lie-detector test, and after Sinclair had threatened to arrange another test that same day (last Monday, I believe).
Since Sinclair had agreed not to take another test for four weeks, Parisi accused him of welshing on the agreement and stopped two of the three checks. I believe two $5000 checks to charities Sinclair nominated were not canceled.
Since Sinclair did not actually take another test, it’s possible that Parisi acted too hastily in canceling the checks, but given Sinclair’s comments about immediately taking another test and his ridiculous accusations (based on nothing but an anonymous phone call, or more likely his own imagination) I doubt Parisi is in any serious legal jeopardy. (Actually, no one being sued or accused by Sinclair at this point is in serious jeopardy!) They could also argue that Sinclair still got his $10k, but decided to give it to charity (depends on the wording of the written contract, if there was one).
At this point, even though Sinclair has finally produced one piece of hard evidence placing him in the Chicago area in 1999, nothing short of hard evidence placing Obama at the scene is going to rescue Sinclair from further ridicule and rejection.
Is that you, DearMurray?
Yo, Larry, repeat after me, certified check, certified check, certified check . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.