Swindled? Somehow you determine that Slick Willard was entitled to those votes? That they were taken from him?
That’s rich.
You have to understand something: people have a hard time liking Slick Willard. Here’s an example of 60% choosing to vote against him.
“Swindled? Somehow you determine that Slick Willard was entitled to those votes? That they were taken from him?”
The plurality of the people in West Virginia who cast votes in West Virginia voted for Mitt Romney. Those who didn’t were given no second choices. Instead, two candidates teamed up on Romney and won an election through dirty politics.
And no, I don’t have to understand anything. I have no interest in the horse manure you’re shoveling. Somewhere in that twisted mind of yours that kind of deal is honorable and acceptable. But that sort of mind places very little interest in the will of the people.
My little one. You HAVE missed something.
It wasn't votes that were stolen. It was electors that were voted for with the intention that they'd elect the person that the VOTERS elected them to vote for. Instead the electors, the McCain and Huckabee campaign's said FU to the voters and did whatever they wanted.
What a dip. Go pound sand.
Over 50% of the people in McCain’s HOME STATE voted against him (i.e. for someone else)
If the mark of a candidate is how many people vote “against” him, none of these guys look great.