Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

That’s untrue. It’s often not even a question of knowing a lot about a candidate, but rather of simple name recognition. Polls between a “known” and and “unknown” will be very different from polls taken once the “unknown” becomes “known.” People don’t tend to indicate a preference in polls for candidates whose names they don’t recognize. A substantial percentage of those polled knew Rudy, McCain, Obama, Hillary, and possibly Edwards, but that’s about where the list ended for a lot of people.

Unfortunately, your arguments are the same as those of the liberals in the GOP establishment. I don’t mean to imply that you are one of them, but simply to observe that we can all fall into the trap of trusting the wrong talking points.


59 posted on 02/02/2008 8:18:31 AM PST by Huber (And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Huber

As Romney has become better known over the past year, his unfavorables have gone UP.

So has the percentage of the population that says it definitely will not vote for him. That’s now at 47%.. hardly promising.

Nor is he as unknown as you think. With 42% saying they have a favorable opinion of him and 48% unfavorable, only 10% failed to express an opinion of him to Ras.


70 posted on 02/02/2008 12:20:15 PM PST by freespirited (The worst Republican is far preferable to the best Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson