Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: San Jacinto
He cannot carry a plurality, much less a majority, of primary voters who self identify in exit polls as Republicans, to say nothing of “Conservative Republicans”.

He was one percentage point shy of carrying the plurality in SC. In a general election, GOP voters who did not support him would have a choice of wasting their vote, essentially electing Hillary, or picking the lesser of evils. I realize some would refuse to vote for him, but a lot are not that stubborn.

He has a lot better chance of being elected than Romney or Huck. Which is a big part of why he is doing so well in the primary. His poll numbers against Hillary are impressive, even in some blue states, where he is currently ahead of her.

53 posted on 02/02/2008 5:34:26 AM PST by freespirited (The worst Republican is far preferable to the best Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited
He has a lot better chance of being elected than Romney or Huck. Which is a big part of why he is doing so well in the primary. His poll numbers against Hillary are impressive, even in some blue states, where he is currently ahead of her.

There's that old electability argument again. How could those polls mean anything when the majority of those polled only know anything about those candidates who have received heavy media coverage for years. Whoever the Republican nominee is, he will receive enough media coverage to change any perceptions or non perceptions that are registered by these early polls. Also, see my earlier post on "electability".

55 posted on 02/02/2008 5:49:52 AM PST by Huber (And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson