[Bigun]

BTW: Calling the foundational work of all modern economic thought (The Wealth of Nations) "just a book" is completely ludicrous.

You are doing whatever may be left of your credibility great harm here.

[xcamel]

Considering it was published 232 years ago in march, it would be quite a stretch to imply that it explicitly endorses the FT, much less take into account the changes in society, government, and monetary systems that have evolved since then. It was also a time when people had to take a c**p behind a tree in the dark.