Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Fred Should Do
The Judge Report ^ | January 21, 2008 | Robert N. Going

Posted on 01/21/2008 9:02:41 AM PST by Cincinnatus

As if the week were not bad enough, now comes news that Fred Thompson is at his 90 year-old mother's bedside, as she fights off pneumonia. I rather suspect that politics is the last thing on his mind at the moment.

So let me do the thinking for him.

All the experts are telling him it's time to get out. The pragmatists and the realists are saying he's fought the good fight, but now the party needs to begin the process of unifying around one of the remaining candidates. They, for the most part, like what Fred had to say and how he said it. But he either didn't get his message across, or the country doesn't want his message. A graceful exit is in order.

And so it was in 1976 when Reagan had lost all the early caucuses and primaries to the pragmatic Gerald R. Ford. The country wasn't ready for a conservative. Hadn't we learned that from the Goldwater race? Reagan represented the minority wing of the minority party, as Nelson Rockefeller famously put it. We didn't need principles, we needed to show that we could govern. We had to listen to what the people were saying and by no means should we be upsetting the apple cart.

Money dried up. In the end, just about the only person telling Reagan not to give up was the guy in the mirror.

But he had something to say, and there was no one else to say it, certainly no one who could say it quite like him. He decided to stay in to the bitter end, even if he lost every primary from then until the convention. He was fighting for what he believed in, and for the soul of the Republican Party, at a time when many of us were beginning to wonder if the party even had a soul.

Eventually his message started resonating. Sure, he lost the nomination, by a hair, but in the process he restored principle to the party, and eventually to the country and the world.

Today there is only one person running for president who can keep the hope of those principles alive.

Stay in, Fred.

This is bigger than all of us.



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatism; conservatives; election; electionpresident; elections; fl2008; fred; fredthompson; gop; president; reaganesque; republicans; ronaldreagan; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 01/21/2008 9:02:42 AM PST by Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

Right on! There is no one else, so Fred should stick to his guns.


2 posted on 01/21/2008 9:06:10 AM PST by jnwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

I like Fred. I find his ambivalence about becoming president to be a sure sign of sanity. And I respect that.

However, I firmly believe that the whole problem with Fred’s candidacy is that the ambivalence has been interpreted by the electorate as indecisiveness—not usually one of the top ten characteristics one looks for in selecting a president.


3 posted on 01/21/2008 9:09:02 AM PST by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus
Stay in, Fred. This is bigger than all of us.

Yup, Fred staying in sends a message to the GOP that conservatives are NOT going to give up and let the party swing socialist. Even if Fred doesn't win, the message does. Go Fred Go!

Oh, and further sticking it to Hookerbee is a nice consolation too.

4 posted on 01/21/2008 9:15:20 AM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart
However, I firmly believe that the whole problem with Fred’s candidacy is that the ambivalence has been interpreted by the electorate as indecisiveness—not usually one of the top ten characteristics one looks for in selecting a president.

I disagree. The average person on the street would not be able to tell you who got in at what date. The media and the other campaigns (Romney and Huckabee, especially) did a phenomenal job keeping this talking point alive (both here and in the MSM). It's not a real point. (Huckabee was a no-name until a few weeks before the Iowa campaign.) It didn't matter what date you "got in." As an opponent of Fred you just have to make it appear that it's important. And they did.

5 posted on 01/21/2008 9:21:03 AM PST by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

Stay in Fred!

Not only stay in, but call Rush Limbaugh and announce on Rush’s show that you’re in for the good fight and tell the rest of RINOs and the media to go pound sand!


6 posted on 01/21/2008 9:22:03 AM PST by sillsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

Please stay in Fred. The nation needs you.

(Me, I think this is another planted false story, akin to the Romney plant of fake-drop-out rumors at Poliico before Iowa.)


7 posted on 01/21/2008 9:26:53 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart
I firmly believe that the whole problem with Fred’s candidacy is that the ambivalence has been interpreted by the electorate as indecisiveness

And if Fred was a go along to get along RINO this would have been described by the commie media as "likeability and easy going."

Fred is a severe threat to the RINO / stealth libs.

8 posted on 01/21/2008 9:27:27 AM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

We see here another quality of Fred’s. He knows family is most important.

Any other candidate, especially Myth and HYuk, would have had 10 newsconferences announcing they’re “still in”.


9 posted on 01/21/2008 9:33:24 AM PST by papasmurf (I'm voting for FRed, even if I have to write him in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

I suppose it doesn’t matter what date you got in. But any opposing candidate would have used Fred’s tardiness against him. And yes, the MSM did help to give that perspective some legs. But everyone plays on the same field.


10 posted on 01/21/2008 9:34:53 AM PST by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TLI

As much as I hate to say it, I think “severe threat” has to be weighed against poor showing at the polls.


11 posted on 01/21/2008 9:36:11 AM PST by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

Of course, in 1976, Fred was one of those opposing Reagan.
And again in 1980.
In 2000, he was one of 4 senators to support McCain


12 posted on 01/21/2008 9:43:48 AM PST by Soliton (Mitt/Huck 2008 "The 50 State Solution ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

It would make sense if there were only two people left and Fred was one of them for him to stay in the race. After all, who would he be hurting?

In a 5-man race, if everybody “stays in” to send a message, we end up with a nominee that wins 35% of the vote, but gets enough winner-take-all delegates to actually win the nomination.

It’s bad for the party to go into the general election with a candidate who never got 50% of the republicans to vote for them.


13 posted on 01/21/2008 9:57:06 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

Excellent comparison to 1976!


14 posted on 01/21/2008 10:01:09 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
It would make sense if there were only two people left and Fred was one of them for him to stay in the race. After all, who would he be hurting?

Is there anybody else left in this race worth stepping aside for? Hearing none, I move the question.

15 posted on 01/21/2008 10:05:32 AM PST by Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

Of course, since Fred is known for making up his own mind, and not listening to what other people want him to do, I imagine that all of the “should he stay or go” discussion is academic.


16 posted on 01/21/2008 11:26:07 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
There is nothing academic about showing that there is still deep and loyal support for the only conservative left in this race.
17 posted on 01/21/2008 11:30:53 AM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“It’s bad for the party to go into the general election with a candidate who never got 50% of the republicans to vote for them.”

It’s even WORSE for the party to go into the general election with the WRONG candidate....


18 posted on 01/21/2008 11:40:18 AM PST by egginanest ( ...save the squirrels...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sillsfan

Hate to tell you, but, Rush is a sellout for Mittens.


19 posted on 01/21/2008 12:02:03 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

This is my first post, so bear with me if I do anything wrong. I want to give the most succinct reason why Thompson should (and will in my opinion) stay in the race.

1. Rasmussen in Fla had Fred running at 12%. Not great, but the Huckster is only at 13%. With a little effort, Thompson will pass Huck. Even if he doesn’t, the Huckabee campaign CAN NOT sustain a 4th or 5th place finish in Fla (that would be devastating and his campaign is broke). He will be done.

2. Julie Annie is running in 3rd to Mitt and McCain. If he loses, with polls in NY having him in 2nd or 3rd, he is done. That most certainly eliminates 2 main contenders (Huck and Rudy).

3. McCain can’t and won’t sustain momentum in closed primary states (he has won largely due to Independents voting). He will be done after Super Tuesday. That leaves us with 2 viable options, Mitt and Fred.

People say Fred doesn’t have money, but he is raising money very, very quickly. One has to figure that, with his message and with the other guys soon to be dropping out, that Thompson will be vaulted to the top.

This is my hope and I am optimistic that tomorrow Fred will stay in the race. I think Jeri wants him to stay in, I don’t think he is a quitter and I think his mom will tell him the same. Don’t quit Fred. Stand strong. The race is still yours to win!


20 posted on 01/21/2008 12:32:10 PM PST by chilepup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson