Does not follow? It follows linearly from your statement.
You, not I, asserted price stability, presumptively as a bulwark for your scheme. I merely pointed out that prices aren't anywhere near stable at this time, and therefore that that feature of your argument was plain rubbish.
You, sir, are the one who mentioned price stability as being advantageous in this discussion, not I.
No it doesn’t because it is two completely different things going on. One is policy in place by the FED causing current price instability, another is a theoretical policy not in place yet which, ceteras paribus, wouldn’t affect prices much. P.S., look up “ceteras paribus,” it’s often assumed in economic debate.