Huckster telling the truth about Romney is negative ?
Romney has been going negative for quite some time now and with great effect .
Telling the truth about Mitt is fine.....acting like your holier than thou, above reproach and still dropping the ads for reporters to view isn't just tacky..........It is Damn Cowardly!
Romney will be the next President.
In my mind, an ad is negative when it attacks someone’s personal character. John McCain uses the MSM newspaper endorsements in an ad to call Romney a “phony.” That’s negative and personal. It doesn't address one's policies or the issues at hand. Additionally, Huck's use of religion as a divisive tool is negative, not factual or policy based.
When Romney runs an ad contrasting himself and Huck on a matter of public policy, he’s not resorting to an ad hominem attack.
None of Romney's factual contrast ads have not been disputed factually by Huck or McCain. They don't deny the truth of the allegations, but instead they call it an "attack" or "mean-spirited" or "hostile." Poor babies. LOL.
Will somebody Please..Please ..tell the good people of Iowa..
THIS PROCESS IS NOT A POPULARITY CONTEST
WE’RE PICKING A PRESIDENT
You are tasked with helping choose the next leader of the Free World and someone that will keep your asses safe from terrorism.