Posted on 11/11/2007 5:26:20 AM PST by Josh Painter
It's those that claim their candidate is the Second Coming that have a hard time understanding why we support Romney. I never claimed Romney was perfect, but that his positive qualities far outweigh the positives of any other candidate.
Look at it this way: Romney is as or more conservative than Bush and most here probably voted for Bush twice.
“Theres nothing you can do after Mitt gives us judicial activists and otherwise non-conservative, Roe v. Wade-friendly judges. (for example)”
You do not know that he will. It is a speculative smear that he might. And even if he does your premise is false.
Just think Harriet Myers.
Conversions of convenience are not really conversions at all...
“JUST TO be sure that you are correct in your assessments, and not just obstinate, when will you confront Mitt Romney in person with these weighty arguments? If you dont then, your arguments are fluff, so please stop repeating them here.”
That’s a big pantsload. Like Romney will give me the time of day, just so I can have a one hour theological and political discussion with him. Are you an operative of the Romney campaign? Why don’t you hook me up and I’d be happy to rip him a new one in a public forum no less.
“your arguments are fluff, so please stop repeating them here.”
Blow it out your ear, I don’t take directions from nutty Mittbot enforcers.
“Look at it this way: Romney is as or more conservative than Bush and most here probably voted for Bush twice.”
Would that be the same Bush who ran us out of the House and Senate in 2006 based on his spending and amnesty for illegal aliens? WoooHoo, now that’s a great analogy leading directly to defeat in 2008.
Indeed...
I don't care if Mitt can win or not! I care whetther or not he will govern "conservatively" because anything less is useless.
Mccain, Snowe, Collins, Hagel, and all the other rino's could win but look where it's gotten conservatives. Conservatives do not need to give in to your kind of thinking NOW because, NOW Mitt is not the only choice we have, we need a conservative to choose.
What don't some you people not understand about, NO MORE RINO'S!!!!
Good points. This time around we have to keep in mind that if we Republicans lose this election, because some voting bloc get ticked off and “stays home” or even worse, “goes third party”, we will be responsible for escorting Bill and Hill back into the Oval Office, with all the implications that has for the future of this country.
This post bears re-visiting PING!!!
Ping a ling for ding-ding!!!
Makes you wonder two things: 1. Why isn't he a Democrat? 2. How is it possible that any conservatives would support him? ![]() |
Fred voted for McCain-Feingold and he voted to let Bill Clinton off the hook during impeachment. Fred did some pro abortion lobbying, I hear.
I’d be careful about casting stones at Mitt Romney if I were you.
Fred voted to convict Clinton on the obstruction of justice charge. Had enough others voted the same Clinton would have been thrown out.
Yes Fred voted for CFR, and Bush signed it.....Fred has since expressed regret for that vote so your point is moot.
Fred did not do pro-abortion lobbying, he gave advice as an employee of a law firm. Fred has a 100% pro life record and has been endorsed by the NRTL and several other pro-life orgs. His pro-life cred is air tight. Get over it.
Don't even try to put Fred in the same category as Mitt-flop when it comes to support for pro-life positions. Mitt's support for the evil Culture of Death is so complete that he disgusts me.![]() |
Oh, Saundra. You sound like a myna bird. Same old, same old dishonest garbage.
Saundra knows all of that. She’s been informed of it 100 times. It’s just the best that she can come up with. She’s reduced to toying with the truth to try to make her points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.