Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politically Correct Donations Only
Campus Report ^ | November 6, 2007 | Don Irvine

Posted on 11/06/2007 7:34:56 AM PST by bs9021

Politically Correct Donations Only

by: Don Irvine, November 06, 2007

The Washington Post reported Saturday that the Smithsonian Institution has put on hold a $5 million donation from the American Petroleum Institute over objections from two of the museum complex's Board of Regents including U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) about accepting money from the oil industry for a project on the world's oceans.

The main objection came from the regents' longtime executive committee chairman Roger Sant who ironically made his fortune as the founder of power company AES which is a member of the American Petroleum Institute.

Since that time though Sant has become a major advocate of protecting the seas including $10 million for the Smithsonian project Ocean Hall which will cost $49 million overall and include a web site to showcase ocean research, a Sant chair for Maine Science and other related programs.

"I have some real concerns about this," Sant told the Post. "I want to be sure that the sponsor's behavior is consistent with the message we're trying to deliver. It is a question mark given the record of oil spills in the past two decades."

Sant also told the Post that when people think of oil and oceans they think of spills. "I know the industry has done quite a bit to minimize [spills] in the future," he said. "I think it is in everyone's mind that oceans and oil are not consistent."

As the former chairman of the World Wildlife Fund, Sant is showing both his bias and ignorance of the oil industry today. Major oil spills have declined dramatically and rarely occur in U.S navigable waters. Also I don't know where he gets the idea that people associate oil and oceans with spills.

(Excerpt) Read more at campusreportonline.net ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: api; donation; petroleum; smithsonian

1 posted on 11/06/2007 7:34:58 AM PST by bs9021
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bs9021

we return the donation so we can tax it.


2 posted on 11/06/2007 7:43:02 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

Perhaps they could be even more pure, and refuse donations from anyone who has ever exhaled carbon dioxide or added to their city’s sewage system.


3 posted on 11/06/2007 7:43:42 AM PST by posterchild (If you don't look ahead nobody will, there's no time to kill - Clint Black)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

And as they finished they hopped into their SUV’s to go home to their 10k sq ft mansions lighted by coal burning fossil fuels and heated with natural gas.


4 posted on 11/06/2007 11:20:16 AM PST by Bob J (For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, there is one striking at its root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021
"I want to be sure that the sponsor's behavior is consistent with the message we're trying to deliver."

How about not trying to deliver a message in the first place?

5 posted on 11/06/2007 11:22:56 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson