Posted on 10/30/2007 11:48:18 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
According to the racist website, VNN forum, neo-Nazi leader Will Williams (aka "White Will") (read about him here) is organizing another in a series of Ron Paul internet dirty tricks of the sort that have distorted cable news snap poll results (read here and here).
Basically, he's asking that Paul supporters all request a particular Paul campaign video from Youtube on a particular date to boost its ratings in Youtube's recommended viewing ratings. By the way, he helpfully indicates that "bjb" won't be able to do this on his "n*ggerberry". "bjb" stands for "burnjewburn", one of the other users of this message board -- he's the one who puts the motto "nothing says lovin' like a jew in the oven" on everything he posts. The other word apparently means blackberry. That's what passes for humor among neo-Nazis.
I post the following with a strong warning, don't click it unless you really need evidence of the above information.
CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING WITH CAUTION -- RACIST WEBSITE:
Youtube tip from Ron Paul guerrilla "gamer" "White Will" - Vanguard News Network Forum
Ping.
And I thought Stormfront was bad.
No Neo-Nazi Links, Maddoggit!
Shocked I tell you! Shocked I am!
Sick POSs
The “No Jews, Just Right” are on board. How nice.
Actually they're all the same. A few years ago a number of neonazis got together and came up with the New Orleans Protocol. Pick your source if you want to read about it. The idea was to put a softer face on Jewhatred and racism, the idea being that converts could be more easily acquired by presenting a more reasonable public image than what you see in the article, and stressing issues like immigration which might give access to a broader audience through infiltration of mainstream groups, like FR, the Paul campaign? Note the thread White Nationalist Group Targets Free Republic For Infiltration , written 2 months after the adoption of the NO Protocol. The objective is bringing converts to their way of thinking.
You'll note folks like David Duke and Willis Carto, both subjects of criticism of Paul, are adherents. Will Williams isn't, so he's a little coarser, but make no mistake, they're all share the same objectives.
The New Orleans ProtocolOn Saturday, May 29, 2004, leaders of groups from three countries struck a historical agreement about future conduct in the post-September 11 era.. The protocol was the initiative of former Louisiana State representative David Duke.
The protocol pledges adherents to a pan-European outlook, recognizing national and ethnic allegiance, but stressing the value of all European peoples. The three provisions of the protocols are:
1. Zero tolerance for violence.
2. Honourable and ethical behaviour in relations with other signatory groups. This includes not denouncing others who have signed this protocol. In other words, no enemies on the right.
3. Maintaining a high tone in our arguments and public presentations.
The founding endorsers of the New Orleans Protocol are EURO and the David Duke Report (David Duke), Stormfront (Don Black), Sam G. Dickson, John Tyndall (a founder of the BNP, but not speaking on behalf of the BNP), the American Free Press (Willis Carto), the Truth at Last (Dr. Ed Fields), the National Alliance (Kevin Alfred Strom and David Pringle), and the Canadian Association for Free Expression [Canada] (Paul Fromm)
============
Paul campaign responds to LST re: Nazi gold
by David Benzion | 10/30/2007 12:23 pm | Alert moderator
http://lonestartimes.com/2007/10/30/rpb2/
Just moments ago, I spoke by phone with Ron Paul press spokesman Jesse Benton regarding a $500 contribution made to the campaign by notorious neo-Nazi Don Black (first exposed here on LST).
The conversation was friendly and professional, and I thank Mr. Benton for getting back in touch with me and being willing to go on the record.
What follows is a paraphrased summary of the questions asked and Benton’s responses (questions were not asked verbatim, but basic thrust was communicated; answers were read back to Benton to assure accuracy and allow him an opportunity to clarify or expand).
————————-
Can Paul confirm that the donation widgets appearing on Stormfront are the result of the site owner’s actions, not the campaign’s?
Yes, absolutely. The donation widgets are freely available to the general public, and anyone can put them on their website without the knowledge of the campaign. We are not advertising on Stormfront.
————————-
Will Paul take measures to block Stormfront as a referring URL to his own website, so that no future donations can possibly flow into his campaign from a site that serves as the on-line nexus of neo-Nazism?
Will Paul ask his own web-staff to trace past donations that were made by anyone arriving at his campaign’s webpage from Stormfront, so that these contributions can be rejected?
Will Paul explore if there are any legal actions available to try to remove his donation widget from Stormfront, and if so pursue them?
We hadn’t thought of these options, but I’ll bring up these ideas with the campaign director.
Blocking the IP address sounds like a simple and practical step that could be taken.
I doubt there is anything we can do legally.
Tracking donations that came from Stormfront’s site sounds more complicated. I’m concerned about setting a precedent for the campaign having to screen and vet everyone who makes a donation.
It is important to keep in mind is that we didn’t solicit this support, and we aren’t interested in spending all of our time and resources focused on this issue. We want to focus on Dr. Paul’s positive agenda for freedom.
————————-
At the very least, will Paul personally state publicly, vigorously and unmistakably that he rejects the support of white supremacists, and that he will not knowingly tolerate their involvement with his campaign in any form or to any degree?
Until three days ago, neither Dr. Paul nor anyone else in the campaign had any idea who Don Black was or is. We’ve never met or communicated with him. We did not solicit his support.
It is certainly unfortunate that the campaign’s donation banner is on his site. We’re not rushing to spend a lot of time reading what’s over there, but what you’ve described is certainly repugnant, and completely anathema to everything Dr. Paul stands for.
————————-
Bottom line– Will the Ron Paul campaign be rejecting the $500 contribution made by neo-Nazi Don Black?
At this time, I cannot say that we will be rejecting Mr. Black’s contribution, but I will bring the matter to the attention of our campaign director again, and expect some sort of decision to be made in coming days.
————————-
There you go America–what say you?
This absolutely deserves a separate thread of its own.
LOL!
What a strong, principled stand!
Anyone still backing Ron Paul is a vicious idiot now, by definition.
Aside from his career as a neonazi, it’s also worth noting Don Black did 3 years in the federal pen, along with 8 or 10 of his fellow Klansmen. For a plot to overthrow the goverment of Dominica I believe. I don’t think many candidates keep contributions from convicted felons.
LOL!
"Are you going to keep money donated by a convicted felon who happens to one of America's foremost neo-Nazis?"
"Umm, I don't know. I'll have to get back to you."
Scum defending scum. Benton and Black: the lowest offscourings of American society.
Benton is not low. Benton is not scum. You are low. You are scum.
Make all the pronouncements you like - you are an expert on exactly nothing.
I cannot wait for the America-hating traitors who back Ron Paul to leave FR.
A self-proclaimed Ron Paul guerrilla Nazi gamer?
How many atomic wedgies do you reckon that’s worth in high school?
$5 says he also listens to My Chemical Romance and wears black lipstick.
Your mom is fat.
I say the campaign rep is full of sh*t.
Almost 4 months to the day and they have yet to take any action against their campaign workers who disparage military veterans.
No public statements, no nothing.
the village idiot’s handlers don’t give a rat’s ass about who supports them as long as they continue to run flak for hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.