Three Words—CONSIDER THE SOURCE.
OK, if it gets down to that, lets find us a woman to run against her. One with name recognition, great looks and smart. It can’t be Coulter or Rice.
The Arkansas curse:
HILLARY FOR YOUR MOTHER-IN-LAW!
I’m a woman, last time I checked and I would vote for Ron Paul before I would vote for Hillary Clinton. Besides, Hillary isn’t really a woman, just a man in a fancy pantsuit.
Notice all of the “Hillary REALLY CAN win!!” stories over the last week or so??
She’s been polling VERY WEAK, and suddenly we have the “New, Softer” Hillary reimage v.7.65...
As a GOP woman, I find that very offensive! I wouldn’t vote for her just based on her sex. Give me Margaret Thatcher, Condoleeza Rice, Laura Ingraham, women with brains.
It would take Hillary running against the devil for me to even consider voting for her and I’d have a hard time deciding which one would be the lesser of two evils.
These are the same groups that gave Bill Clinton a COMPLETE PASS on a CREDIBLE RAPE ACCUSATION (actually several) because "his politics are good for women"