Candidate "CALCULATOR" -- Gotta try this !

Candidate Calculator ^ | Today | David Osborne

[davidosborne]

http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html

I played around with this and answered all the questions the OPPOSITE and I was told my candidate was Dennis Kucinich... Then I went back and answered all the question CORRECTLY and got Duncan Hunter...

So I guess Duncan Hunter is the OPOSITE of Dennis Kucinich according to my political thinking..

TRY IT...

http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html

[davidosborne]

Interesting “calculator” have fun with it !

[bpjam]

Well, apparently I’m only 96% in tune with Fred. But I’m 97% in tune with Mitt. Surprise, surprise.

But I am 30.19% in agreement with Hillary. So that should give her at least some way to spin her ‘support’ amongst Red America.

[SoldierMedic]

Interesting. I only tweaked the yes/no buttons, ignoring the how important function. I’m:

Tommy Thompson with 82%
Joe Biden with 73%
Rudy Guliani with 73%
Chris Dodd with 68%

[sageb1]

I got Tancredo. Not my pick, but I’m also not surprised.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[azhenfud]

Texas Representative Ron Paul (R)
82.76% match

Your Other Top Matches
You will want to pay close attention to these candidates through election day.

View/Hide Other Top Matches
Former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson (R) - 79.31%
Kansas Senator Sam Brownback (R) - 68.97%
California Representative Duncan Hunter (R) - 68.97%

[azhenfud]

Hey, you folks oughta give this a try - it’s neat!

[sierrascrapper]

Your Results
This page shows how well you match on the issues with each candidate. The candidate calculator uses your responses to determine a percentage of how much you agree with the candidates on issues.

Your Top Match
You planned to vote for Hunter. Based on your responses, your top candidate for 2008 is below.

California Representative Duncan Hunter (R)
91.67% match

:: :: :: ::
Your Other Top Matches

Colorado Representative Tom Tancredo (R) - 89.74%
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (R) - 80.77%
Former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson (R) - 80.77%

[davidosborne]

Duncan Hunter.........90.91%
Fred Thompson.........87.88%
Tom Tancredo..........84.85%
Mike Huckabee.........78.79%

Barack Obama..........30.30%
Christopher Dodd......27.27%
John Edwards..........27.27%
Dennis Kucinich.......9.09%

[llmc1]

Romney 100% — Ouch

Hunter 85%
Thompson 85%
Tancredo 84%

[davidosborne]

The first time I took it I scored Higher for Duncan Hunter, but I never looked at how I scored with the other candidates.. I don’t remember exactly what I put the first time High/Medium/Low, after I took it again I scored what I posted in #10

[davidosborne]

LOL - Don’t be discouraged my FRiend

There are other factors to consider when choosing who to vote for to be Commander in Chief, agreeing on non-defense related issues is great but secondary IMHO. All things considered, Duncan Hunter is BY FAR the best candidate in the race IMHO..

[boxerblues]

bump for later

[Hoodlum91]

Romney
Fred
Hunter - tied
Tommy Thompson - Tied (?)

Seems weird that Tommy Thompson and Duncan Hunter are the exact same percentage.

[ssaftler]

I tried it and the candidate I plan to vote for was the one with whom I agree the most, a 91% fit.

[llmc1]

“All things considered, Duncan Hunter is BY FAR the best candidate in the race”

I agree completely.

[Liz]

Thanks. That was neat-—got my candidate-—my fave brother (snicker)

[lucyblue]

I must be doing something wrong...
It’s not telling me who I match with, only lets me expand the ‘composite candidate’ and the scoring legend.
(Hunter isn’t in the composite list at all, does that mean he is my match?)
Can anybody tell me what I’m doing wrong?

[codercpc]

Mitt 95%

Fred 95%

Rudy 90%

Brownback 90%

Looks like I will be happy with any of the primary winners!!!!