Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WLR

That’s funny, I thought that uttering threats and threatening behaviour were criminal offenses. I was also under the impression that the constabulary tended to frown on prevarication.

Oh yeah, this is a police officer we are discussing: they don’t have to obey the same laws the rest of us do.

Listen to yourself, FRiend. The contradictions are staggering.


733 posted on 12/04/2007 8:49:21 PM PST by Don W (I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger. Then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: Don W

Don

“That’s funny, I thought that uttering threats and threatening behavior were criminal offenses. I was also under the impression that the constabulary tended to frown on prevarication.”

///////////////////////////////////

I don’t agree that it is right.. I do think the evidence shows it is not illegal for law enforcement to really push the envelope to behave as he did.

If he had in fact committed a crime on video I find it hard to believe he would not have been prosecuted with so much public attention being paid to the issue. That he was not is telling and supports my contention that the law should be refined to specifically prohibit that form of conduct.. I still maintain the Officer was “let go” in order to cover up the legality of his conduct variations of which are commonly practiced all the time. Practices which LE does not want to change.

W


736 posted on 12/05/2007 2:02:23 PM PST by WLR (Defeating Liberalism and The East since 500 BC Iran delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson