Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: L98Fiero; robertpaulsen
“My point being that he was setting up the cop.”

No doubt. The cop fell for it hook, line and sinker.

Why go so far as to "set up" the cop--unless there have been complaints about him before and the Police Department did nothing?

The intent was to get indisputable proof. The burden of proof is always on the person bringing the complaint, and unfortunately, when it comes down to the word of the average citizen vs. the word of the police, especially in the absence of witnesses, the injustice system will usually side with the police. This police officer knew that, since he threatened to trump up more charges. He knew he could get away with it. That's abuse of power.

The kid didn't get him fired. His own actions did. I wouldn't be surprised if some of his co-workers at the Precinct are happy to see him gone, too.

438 posted on 09/23/2007 3:34:29 PM PDT by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: pray4liberty

“Why go so far as to “set up” the cop—”

This kid gets off on it. He does it all the time. No doubt he has MANY encounters with the police that he tapes that are quite benign. Can’t have THOSE getting out, though.

I’m not defending the officer’s actions. I’m saying he was set up, provoked and fell for it hook, line and sinker. I don’t appreciate people interfering with police officers, good or bad, for their own jollies.


441 posted on 09/23/2007 3:49:01 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson