Yes it may be scientific, and may in fact represent the opinion of the population as of the date... however it gives little or any indication how folks will feel on election day.
I believe ACTIVE FReepers represent the CONSERVATIVE BASE in America fairly accurately, you can’t deny the fact that Duncan Hunter has far more “ACTIVE FReepers” that support him than any other candidate. I am not talking about the FReepers who vote in a FR poll, but the ones that are out there posting everyday like you and I... that is the only point I was making... that data might be irrelevent to you, but it is significant to me...
FReegards,
David
Of course I can.
“Oh but wait a sec, after a more careful analysis there seems to be a slight difference between the “Members” and the “Non-Members” I am not smart enought to understand scientific polls like this one, so can someone please explain it to me.”
LOL
Here’s what happened in Ron Paul’s OWN State of TEXAS, when Ron Paulbots couldn’t spam or cheat:
“Duncan Hunter doubled the totals of the next-closest candidate, garnering 534 of approximately 1,400 votes cast. Fred Thompson came in second with 266 votes, and Paul rounded out the top three with 217 votes.
Here are all the results:
Duncan Hunter: 534
Fred Thompson: 266
Ron Paul: 217
Mike Huckabee: 83
Rudy Giuliani: 78
Mitt Romney: 61
Ray McKinney: 28
John Cox: 10
John McCain: 8
Sam Brownback: 6
Tom Tancredo: 6
Hugh Cort: 3”
I’m now walking away smiling and whistling. :)