I may be going out on a limb here, but I think there needs to first be a trial by jury. If he is convicted, then he goes to jail. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Ok, you're not wrong and of course there should be a trial.
But what I am reacting to is the obvious fact that he's not even fired, let alone charged with the crime when ample evidence exists to charge him.
Care to place odds that he ever will be charged with anything at all? Then care to consider what would already have happened to the perp if the shoe had been on the other foot?
You and I would already be in jail right now but this asshole is "suspended". yeah, there's the rule of law in action...